Maybe I'm Crazy: Or maybe IRTR is STUPID.
ORLY?
News to me!
Yet again, IRTR demonstrates theoretical ineptitude in art -- despite the practical brilliance of certain artists associated with IRTR.
According to Cornell University "Warhol converted Mao into an international pop icon" http://www.explore.cornell.edu/scene.cfm?scene=wason%20collection&stop=WC%20-%20Gallery%20China&view=WC%20-%20China%2026
Can't IRTR read between the lines -- or read at all? Big hint IRTR: Warhol was pushing Mao! Warhol painted lipstick on Mao for his queer audience. He painted Mao in multicolors to show him as all things to all men. It's not like bourgeois art funders are going to cheer when they get a Maoist message. So the possibility to read Warhol as attacking Mao was a practical concession made to secure funding and more importantly: showings.
Warhol was openly gay for and it is somehow surprising that he is using a rainbow spectrum in his work? So you have a GAY painter making RAINBOW pictures of people even painting fucking LIPSTICK ON THE GUY. And this is? An artistic mind fuck and IRTR is soooooo stupid for not seeing that.
Is IRTR homophobic? Why the big opposition to rainbows? A rainbow is a symbol of inclusion in case IRTR had not figured that out. Painting a rainbow on Stalin's lips is an attack on the lie that Stalin was homophobic. Stalin's gender line was progressive even about homosexuals. As always - he had a lot to balance. And Your Minister as usual made none of the images but rather lovingly stole them and remixed them. People in Russia are pushing Stalin as cool techno DJ and pro-queer rights. But IRTR is lagging. Just goes to show the global proletariat leads the way.
Warhol was also of course pointing out the mass consumption of art -- thus he used this technique in other presentations as well. One ought to analyze the colors he uses. His other major 4x4 reproduction in rainbow colors was of Marilyn Monroe who he also presents as being all things to all men. Is anyone saying Warhol was mocking Monroe? No. He was saying that capitalism mass produces art. So the use of this style with a socialist leader is at once critical of socialism, asking it whether it will reproduce the capitalist system, pro-queer rights, and mocking of capitalism. IRTR just doesn't get it.
More hints IRTR: Warhol set up the velvet underground -- which means Lou Reed. Enjoying that anti-war remake of take a walk on the wild side? Fuck, are you people willfully stupid? The mans protege is solidly anti imperialist. So of course Warhol was mocking mao. He was just too stupid to figure out that Lou Reed and Velvet Underground were anti war anti imperialist and even anti capitalist.
Capitalist Art is about double entendre to manipulate the massess into slavery. Maoist art is about exposing that and about using double entendre to liberate. Guess what sometimes artists have to camouflage their message. The camo in Warhol's case is much less thick than IRTR.
Okay, IRTR is so stupid I have to write out what is between the lines. Warhol COULD NOT HAVE MADE ANYTHING MORE PRO MAO AND HAD A CAREER DODOS!!!
The brilliant scientific theorists at IRTR would do better to chew on
http://www.tnr.com/blog/spine?pid=58195
than to fuck around with visuality. A refutation of that shit is a much better use of your time stick figure scientists.
Warhol knew perfectly well how to portray things as good, evil or ambivalent. His portrayals of Mao are GOOD. But you have to have a brain to decipher the color coding.
Here, hints:
We have a RED (COMMUNIST NOT AN ABORIGINGAL) _MAN
who is OPPOSING the WHITE MAN
and he wants EVERYONE to have ENOUGH TO EAT
Fuck IRTR are you really that stupid? Do I need to point out the YELLOW? Are those YELLOW BASTARDS YELLOW CHICKENS? HEY WHAT'S UP WITH THAT _RED SOUP MR. WARHOL?
There are intersubjective emotional color significations. They are well known. There are also intersubjective political color significations. And there are semi-objective color and racial correlations. IRTR ignores them all in its crusade against color.
The conservatives in America with their red state/blue state reversal are trying to fuck with the intersubjective political spectrum of "red" for socialist "blue" for conservative by the way. If IRTR cared to they could start analyzing any Mao painting saying "Oh, here he is talking of the ENVY OF THE POOR -- that's why he has a green face! OH HOW CLEVER. And, look LOUD FUCKING COLORS TO MAKE THIS SHIT OBVIOUS EVEN TO THE UNEDUCATED AND THE STUPID!
IRTR doesn't seem to like loud color or rainbows. Apparently IRTR wants colors in harmony, soft shadings, subtle nuances gentle gentle gentle. PFFFT. That is a BOURGEOIS aesthetic. They don't seem too happy with black and white either. But then again: IRTR is visually clueless.
Having demolished the idiotic argument of IRTR Your Minister returns to the more important task: Making Art!
