FILE DUMP / REDS / Sex-Gender
Still no word back from Google or Immortal Technique: The Art Ministry is going with the assumption that the video was pulled by google because damnit niggers can't have guns. This is one more example of the white nation oppressing the Black Nation.
So Your Minister has gotten all uppity about it: Here
http://www.esnips.com/profile/df473d91-ef84-4299-8baa-ed26c1cb8b64
A file dump. Your Minister recommends a dispersed tactic. So rather than giving out passwords to the file dump Your Minister recommends You make Your Own. eSnips has 1 gigabyte of storage.
MIM recently reviewed REDS. This is really good since a lot of Your Ministers work has to do with sex. Sex sells and it's idealist to pretend otherwise. Your Minister, until told otherwise, is going with the line : "Use the erotization of power to destroy the eroticization of power". So don't expect über fappy vids. Nope. Tease, sublimate yes. Besides if the goal were reichian maoist orgasms leading to lots of red babies fapping wouldn't be the objective anyway.
Unfortunately Your Minister has never seen reds. And it aint on google or youtube or video.yahoo.com So your Minister needs either to see a copy of that video uploaded somewhere, anywhere or to have the plotline in reds drawn out.
Basically: The art ministry requires catchy brief slogans 10 words at most preferably 5. Things like "Communism will win" seem simplistic but are true and easy to remember. Effective propaganda is easily understood. It would be nice if MIM put this all into context. A discussion of Kolontai is also lacking.
"With these two bits of information about Eugene O'Neill and John Reed we can piece together what it is that Louise Bryant is really about. She loves creative power. Creative power is the real power, as opposed to the appearance of power that appears to exist when one is a cog-in-the-machine. The Russian Revolution was about real power, the ability to change something, not just play a role in a system."
Your Minister reads that as a validation of her approach to sex and art.
"Louise Bryant is consistent in adapting to and loving creative power. For most people there will be an underlying class reason for such an adaptation. Louise Bryant's frustration and vacillation stem from not understanding the roots of her own desires."
That is the case of Your Minister and likely the reviewe of Evanescence as well. Flirt Flirt.
"Chinese comrades did criticize women who fell for responsible comrades with upper class backgrounds in droves."
Hence the eroticization of peasants is a correct tactic and the de-roticization of bourgeois financiers also the correct tactic. Dominatrixes stripping bourgeois pigs of cash for revolution is what comes to Your Minister's pornified decadant mind.
"Theorist Catharine MacKinnon goes on at length on the nature of male desire, but it is often the case that female desire is the more interesting question."
Yes; Back to the intriguing essentialist flirtation of the reviewer of evanescence. Is there a biological basic difference between male and female desire -- male desire being direct, single minded and temporally limited -- female desire being encompassing contextualized and limitless?
"The task going forward in the imperialist countries is to find what remains of romance without the intrigue of power--and the answer could well be "not much."
Yes. This explains why BDSM is such a big sexual practice in contemporary imperialism. The imperialists having no _real battle of the sexes have to create a virtual one to maintain their relations. Your Minister is of the opinion that a balanced partnership of equals is the best form of a relation. However Your Minister can well imagine an imbalanced relation working where each partner has complimentary roles. Or even where those roles of supporting / directing switch.
"we are tired of the liberalism versus reaction question which still absorbs the other organizations calling themselves "Marxist."
Your Minister has no fucking clue what is meant here. Detail this and dumb it down for the lumpen please.
"The underlying reason for difficulties that re-surfaces particularly at this time is a biological throwback-- that we are descendants of males with the most drive to mate. The biological component to male desire remains stronger than in females. Thus, once freed of coercion, adult females have no stable reason for family. It is not biology or pursuit or adaptation to power that can "save the family."
MIM itself flirts with essentialism. This is interesting. Your Minister has no worked out line on essentialism. Your Minister hopes to see a struggle clarify the line on biology's role in gender / sex.
Save the family? Is that even on the agenda? Your Minister only presented "pro family" art (Half Jack) because many of the disaffected youth are from divorced families. Bourgeois society created the disposable family. But Maoist society will almost certainly not reinstitute the family. Rather a socialization of family functions -- creche, day care, kindergarten, baby sitters -- will happen.
"Despite the changing patterns of facts of our day, our communist movement remains mired in a gender politics appropriate for World War I. MIM is not interested in liberalism versus reaction questions on gender anymore. We point directly at the lack of an individual basis for the family that is not centered on love of power."
Your Minister does not "get it". Yes, with no economic compulsion the family disintegrates. Thus disposable families become possible. Your Minister sees that and even what will replace the family. BUT your Minister Does Not Understand the debates within the communist movement the article is addressing! Clarification is needed, if possible with simple slogans.
Also: Everyone should write google and bitch about them pulling that video. It was almost certainly google and not immortal technique that did that. KraKKers.
So Your Minister has gotten all uppity about it: Here
http://www.esnips.com/profile/df473d91-ef84-4299-8baa-ed26c1cb8b64
A file dump. Your Minister recommends a dispersed tactic. So rather than giving out passwords to the file dump Your Minister recommends You make Your Own. eSnips has 1 gigabyte of storage.
MIM recently reviewed REDS. This is really good since a lot of Your Ministers work has to do with sex. Sex sells and it's idealist to pretend otherwise. Your Minister, until told otherwise, is going with the line : "Use the erotization of power to destroy the eroticization of power". So don't expect über fappy vids. Nope. Tease, sublimate yes. Besides if the goal were reichian maoist orgasms leading to lots of red babies fapping wouldn't be the objective anyway.
Unfortunately Your Minister has never seen reds. And it aint on google or youtube or video.yahoo.com So your Minister needs either to see a copy of that video uploaded somewhere, anywhere or to have the plotline in reds drawn out.
Basically: The art ministry requires catchy brief slogans 10 words at most preferably 5. Things like "Communism will win" seem simplistic but are true and easy to remember. Effective propaganda is easily understood. It would be nice if MIM put this all into context. A discussion of Kolontai is also lacking.
"With these two bits of information about Eugene O'Neill and John Reed we can piece together what it is that Louise Bryant is really about. She loves creative power. Creative power is the real power, as opposed to the appearance of power that appears to exist when one is a cog-in-the-machine. The Russian Revolution was about real power, the ability to change something, not just play a role in a system."
Your Minister reads that as a validation of her approach to sex and art.
"Louise Bryant is consistent in adapting to and loving creative power. For most people there will be an underlying class reason for such an adaptation. Louise Bryant's frustration and vacillation stem from not understanding the roots of her own desires."
That is the case of Your Minister and likely the reviewe of Evanescence as well. Flirt Flirt.
"Chinese comrades did criticize women who fell for responsible comrades with upper class backgrounds in droves."
Hence the eroticization of peasants is a correct tactic and the de-roticization of bourgeois financiers also the correct tactic. Dominatrixes stripping bourgeois pigs of cash for revolution is what comes to Your Minister's pornified decadant mind.
"Theorist Catharine MacKinnon goes on at length on the nature of male desire, but it is often the case that female desire is the more interesting question."
Yes; Back to the intriguing essentialist flirtation of the reviewer of evanescence. Is there a biological basic difference between male and female desire -- male desire being direct, single minded and temporally limited -- female desire being encompassing contextualized and limitless?
"The task going forward in the imperialist countries is to find what remains of romance without the intrigue of power--and the answer could well be "not much."
Yes. This explains why BDSM is such a big sexual practice in contemporary imperialism. The imperialists having no _real battle of the sexes have to create a virtual one to maintain their relations. Your Minister is of the opinion that a balanced partnership of equals is the best form of a relation. However Your Minister can well imagine an imbalanced relation working where each partner has complimentary roles. Or even where those roles of supporting / directing switch.
"we are tired of the liberalism versus reaction question which still absorbs the other organizations calling themselves "Marxist."
Your Minister has no fucking clue what is meant here. Detail this and dumb it down for the lumpen please.
"The underlying reason for difficulties that re-surfaces particularly at this time is a biological throwback-- that we are descendants of males with the most drive to mate. The biological component to male desire remains stronger than in females. Thus, once freed of coercion, adult females have no stable reason for family. It is not biology or pursuit or adaptation to power that can "save the family."
MIM itself flirts with essentialism. This is interesting. Your Minister has no worked out line on essentialism. Your Minister hopes to see a struggle clarify the line on biology's role in gender / sex.
Save the family? Is that even on the agenda? Your Minister only presented "pro family" art (Half Jack) because many of the disaffected youth are from divorced families. Bourgeois society created the disposable family. But Maoist society will almost certainly not reinstitute the family. Rather a socialization of family functions -- creche, day care, kindergarten, baby sitters -- will happen.
"Despite the changing patterns of facts of our day, our communist movement remains mired in a gender politics appropriate for World War I. MIM is not interested in liberalism versus reaction questions on gender anymore. We point directly at the lack of an individual basis for the family that is not centered on love of power."
Your Minister does not "get it". Yes, with no economic compulsion the family disintegrates. Thus disposable families become possible. Your Minister sees that and even what will replace the family. BUT your Minister Does Not Understand the debates within the communist movement the article is addressing! Clarification is needed, if possible with simple slogans.
Also: Everyone should write google and bitch about them pulling that video. It was almost certainly google and not immortal technique that did that. KraKKers.
posted by Maoist Internationalist Movement at 12:55 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home