GPCR part 3 (Morpheus notes).

This didn't upload properly now it is.

I don't interpret IRTR running a two part series on Lin Biao (who led a coup against Mao...) as a metaphoric attack on MIM ; Metaphoric attacks are in line when dealing with people outside the united front. Of course, IRTR is as IRTR does; dropping the review of Hidden Agenda is an example of sectarianism. Believe it or not, the errors IRTR makes in dealing with MIM are sort of irrelevant. The correct line is worked out in struggle with the incorrect line. Though, Your Minister does get tired of seeing the idealism in IRTR thinking. I mean, aside from being sectarian and making non cardinal issues cardinal it's basically liberal individualism, the idea that one can somehow be pure which isn't realistic. Your Minister hasn't bothered responding to IRTRs criticism because 1) Her time has been MUCH better spent getting thousands and thousands of viewers. The Web Minister can easily verify the efficacity or lack thereof of the Art Ministry. MIM has explicitly said sex and music are two cultural aspects that people eat right up. MIM has eplicitly said that we reshape the old bourgeois culture rather than come up with (literally!) stick figures. Yes a stick figure on a water cooler illustrates a concept but Your Minister has -- and this since years -- been driving at the concept of visual art specifically animated art. IRTR is not idealist when they take up the weapon of video art. But elsewhere? 2) IRTR is basically pissing on ur Minister. It was pissing me off but now when I work up a head of steam I put it to work in a useful way by revolutionizing your pornified eyes. Ask any 14 year old about porn. EVEN IN EASTERN EUROPE. Go ahead.

Basically, IRTR visual strategy is like trying to find Neo -- while ignoring the Appoc's, Tanks and Trinities, looking for "the one" person in 1000 in the imperialist countries who will reach MIM thought. Yes we want the Neos, the "future Tigers" that MIM does talk about and talk up. Your Minister even has some ideas who those future tigers are. But it is adventurism to think we can find Neo and that's it. We can do plenty of revolutionary work with a bunch of Apocs. We may well have to do exactly that -- and we can. And how do you reach out to that Matrix of pornified bought off sleepers?

There is a tactical question, whether 9 out of 10 of the internet is imperialist or whether it is only 6 of 10 or some other stat. Your Minister thought it was 99 out of 100 and the uploads from the Islamic Army show us that it is not so lopsided as Your Minister thought. She still thinks we have at least 60 percent and more likely 90 percent imperialists as our audience.

IRTR thinks it is able to make the hard Maoist message and that all the true revolutionaries will eventually find that. This ignores that we can make non revolutionaries into revolutionaries. It also assumes that those true revolutionaries will somehow find the obscure IRTR videos. No. Your Minister casts a broad net, knowing full well at best 60 percent of the audience are on our side. Yeah, but suppose only 20% are true revolutionaries. What about that vacillating 20%. IRTRs approach won't reach them.

For fucks sake if they simply relabled Double Feature with tags "Fluke Atom Bomb" they would get more traffic. No, traffic doesn't matter to IRTR. Well it sure does to MIM or MIM would not bother putting out traffic statistics even in difficult times. Those traffic stats aren't there for Your Minister. Hey IRTR for whose benefit does MIM put out that sensitive information?

IRTR thinks it's sniping and can find the one distant target. That's not the way it is. This game is like pachinko: each one of those little ball bearings might be a revolutionary and you cannot predict who will become Maoist except by dropping them through the maze. Your Minister hasn't raised this yet because Your Minister wanted the IRTR to figure out how to spot, block and spotlight the Ciphers in the movement without training state agents.

IRTRs idealism allowed it to make the false accusation that Your Minister somehow didn't upholad the cardinal principle that the first world so - called workers are a labor aristocracy. Total bullshit. Whoever spews that line should get some spotlight put on their other points.

MIM has also made clear that people are expected to be their own leaders; Your Minister's line that people out of communication with MIM should pursue independant operations is correct.

In fact, Your Minister now challenges IRTR here to come up with something more substantive than Mousnonya doesn't play this game the way IRTR wants her to. Because Your Minister is owning you, you and your pans and zooms too.

Here, get pwn3or3d,



No definition of Maoist Art has appeared from IRTR. This is really disappointing. Mousnony started a bbs at yahoo, then somewhere else. That second BBS had a nice color scheme. IRTS color scheme isn't revolutionary red and black. Okay, so IRTR has no idea about color psychology. But Your Minister sees no reason to go to IRTR hat in hand for much of anything. However, that other BBS has reopened with a black and yellow color scheme. Hm. Your Minister had nothing to do with that reactivation.

Color signification
Red (us)
Black (anarchist black nation)
White (the enemy)
Orange (protestant's color; also for warning)
Blue (corporate -- enemies)
Yellow (color of money, but also of asians, also for warning and the color of liberals like the FDP in Germany; color of envy/jealousy in Eastern Europe)
Green -- Politically environmentals. In the u.s. color of envy/jealousy and of money. In Europe color of hope/fertility).
Silver -- color of money but also for representing technology (metals)
Gray -- storms/dusk/uncertainty/hardness/science
Violet -- color of healing

These are first world color significations; third worlder's may have different significations.