The Art Ministry's Perspective on MIM's Shift
Authoritarianism, cryptic communication, metaphoric struggle and the battle to gain both the lumpen and intellectuals have recently become key aspects of MIM thought. This is the sort of quantum state change that arises dialectically, a sudden rapid qualitative transformation resulting from a long series of gradual quantitative changes. These new ways of fighting are frankly exciting. People who thought "MIM be dead" were simply very wrong.
Why did I say (me say? this author say?) "People who thought "MIM BE dead" were simply very wrong."? That is an example of using the subjunctive + ghetto talk simultaneously to reach both the intellectuals and the lumpen (ghetto defendants). It's a two-for-one and the sort of thing MIM is expecting all comrades to "get" and do.
BTW The multiple parantheticals are a pomo tip.
Do I study neocon rhetoric? Of course. Does it help the struggle to ask fake questions? Only if it's cryptic.
To understand the struggle to hit the intellos and reach out to and lift up the lumpen we need to ask ourselves what is intellect? We communists know correct ideas do not fall from the sky, they are not innate, genetic or inborn. Correct ideas result from practical struggle with incorrect ideas. That is one reason the communist side will eventually and inevitably win: our enemies are blocked by their genetic elitism from developing all their potential resources. We can and should aim to get the lumpen "up to speed" it is why Mao taught literacy. All people are about equally intelligent, one more reason we're a bunch of fucking commies.
What is intellect? One aspect is the ability to encode and decode messages. Another aspect is creativity. What is creativity? Creativity is the promiscuous recombination of existing ideas to invent new ones. Intellectuals, that word I use, promiscuous, is not just metaphoric it is also literal as any lumpen so-called idiot will see. Artists want to stick their brushes in paint buckets and then smear paint on just about anything and yes that is a metaphor for fucking. Art is creative, the result of a promiscuous assault on the senses. Is this an indirect criticism of certain persyns? Duh.
But part of intellect is structure and discipline the ability to present a coherent message. Mere creativity, unfocussed undisciplined is anarchism or liberalism. It is a step forward from authoritarian feudalism. But it is not sufficient to get us out of blood soaked capitalism. We can expect lumpen to be creative and unfocussed. We can expect intellos to be focussed but uncreative. We need both aspects. I own you artistically because I know how to hit both levels at once and because I am more promiscuous. My critic's art is focussed but uncreative and generally hits only the intellectuals. Hitler said outright: >>ditch the intellectuals it's all practice baby<< and he was right about practice, possibly about the intellos. If lumpen or intellos should get priveleged I would privelege the lumpen struggle, not the struggle for intellos. We have plent of fascist intellos. I just dont see a lumpen protofascist movement, unlike in the labor aristocracy. Lumpen resgination to fate and indifference to consequences immunizes the lumpen against greed and fascism. Also lumpen are better at solidarity than labor aristocrats or l.a. wannabes.
How do authoritarianism/authoritarian "thinking" and creativity relate?
MIM recently has become authoritarian in some senses. MIM is making clear that some security struggles are going to be in the dark and others are going to be in the day and others will be in that shadow world of paranoia, metaphor, image-i-nation. This is why IRTR missed the boat and is playing sink-or-swim. They did not see the shift in tactics, the reason for that shift. Mao tells us plainly: we must take the enemy tactically dead serious. Those fuckers have guns and are trigger happy as we can plainly see. But we must also have strategic confidence in the proletariat because the exploited are the world's majority. We must likewise have contempt for the enemy strategically. The capitalists and imperialists, the war mongers, they are the real "dead enders". Rumsfeld was a dead ender. Jester Cheney is a dead ender. They represent a dying class, a dying world, and a world we are all too happy to help to die.
What is authoritarian reasoning?
Authoritarian reasoning is to look at intellect not as a function of disciplined coherent direction of creative promiscuity directed toward encoding and decoding messages. Rather it is to see being right as a function of one's social status in the society. For example, this minister had enormous strategic confidence in MIM when the hidden struggles of the past "X" years -- which struggles she did not see, not at all! -- finally broke lose on the surface. This minister played "follow the leader" the game of authoritarians everywhere. Where did that confidence come from? Why was it not misplaced? We certainly did not see such confidence among certain (all?) elements of IRTR!
This confidence arose from PRACTICE. Your Minister had been in constant struggle to understand MIM since years and Germoney since a decade (or more). She only recognized the warning signals of the past years, the reasons for MIMs actions, *after* the struggles became evident. Though This Minuister can "read between the lines" before the cryptic struggles became evident YM did not read MIM that way. MIM has not only said rtfm it also says "from now on WRITE between the lines". At which point YM knew -- read between the lines! Connect the dots! Put the ball in the hoop! This really liberated me from the need for direction, confirmation, reassurance that my line was more correct than Stalin's -- and it is. I can claim to be more correct than stalin because MIM thought is built on Mao who built on Stalin. I would have to deviate seriously from MIM line to be less correct than Stalin, and I don't pfft. So it isn't bragging or unrealistic to say YM is more correct than Stalin. It is also not an indirect critique of Stalin. MIM probably underestimates Stalin because of being blind to the cryptic struggles that happened in the 1930s. MIM knows that Stalin was 100% right to send all those fuckers to the gulag, especially after the recent rioting in Tallinn which revealed the ugly sad truth of post-revisionist neo-fascism in Eastern Europe. MIM does not read or write about Stalin enough for my liking. This is because Stalin has been succesfully smeared by the enemy, just like they are trying to paint a shit mustache on Mao today. Combatting the smearing of Stalin and Mao is a key task of the art ministry. Since we don't aim to get the majority in the imperialist lands we should be all the more willing to cheer Stalin. Indeed, Stalin is my homeboy!
Were the nameless renegades, the degenerates, the sectarian defectors, reading between the lines? Know idea. Good question. I doubt it. They underestimated MIM because of a lack of practice working with MIM. MIM was NOT engaging in authoritarian reasoning when it said something along the lines of "Mousnonya has been pumping out Maoism for years, don't have a cow". MIM was engaging in using practice as the guide to correct ideas, and people who missed that boat were using some other standard, probably an idealist one.
Allegories and Metaphors:
MIM is going to be writing between the lines, IMO till socialism, at least. I think allegorical writing under the JDOP may not be the way to go because it risks covering for capitalist restoration. That may be an example of how an idea dialectically transforms into its opposite under certain conditions. The correct idea of using allegorical/metaphorical struggle under capitalism maybe becomes the incorrect idea under socialism -- this is the sort of theoretical struggle where the cartesian intellectual renegades could make points now for battles 20-50 years in the future. Will they? I don't know.
Opponent Modeling
Yes, that is a keyword from artificial intelligence, feds MIM is not joking about Markov, im in ur packets cracking ur cipher, sniff sniff. MIM has also made clear that we must be able to see the world through the enemies' eyes. Hey, what happens when 2 or 3 universities computer labs start paralell processing ur cipher? Heheh.
MIM has been tolerant of this minister because I sure as hell can see through the enemy's eyes, at least some of them. MIM has been modelling the two main wings of imperialism recently, Hooverites vs. Rockefellers, though less developed models of liberals & libertarians also exist.
Werewolves & lone wolves
After the Nazis were defeated they tried to start guerilla armies. The ones in Eastern Europe got funded by the CIA and were troublemaking well into the 1950s, i.e. until the revisionist traitor Khruschev came to power. The video "Metaphors" hinted at that and now I draw the line for those that didn't bother following. Why did I do that, bait Nazis, taunt stupid renegade Maoists? Part of art is to seize the imagination. Maoists ARE in a multigenerational struggle against a bunch of fucking vampires. This was NOT the only reason. Nazis figured out something that MIM has or is figuring out, about struggling as a minority: we activists must be able to operate as "lone wolves" to land blow after blow in complete isolation with no support encouragement or even acknowledgement. Go ahead google
nazi lone wolves
and see what get's thrown up in your face. This is why MIM underestimates Stalin, a bit, we simply cannot see all the cryptic struggles of the 30s which explain why he was so bloody repressive. But we know the outcome. Fifth column? What fifth column. It is dead or in prison. Go Stalin! And before whining about why Stalin outright shot so many people tell me, if Japan invaded Russia instead of attacking Amerika what happens next? I will tell you what: Siberian labor camps get "liberated" and all those fifth columnists get armed by the Japanese and the fascists win the second world war. How Stalin maneuvered Japan into attacking the U.S. instead of the USSR is beyond our knowledge but he did and that forced the Nazis to go into hiding for about 20 years: The Nazi's grandchildren are ruling the world today.
Even after all the repression Stalin did, lots of Ukrainians nevertheless betrayed their country and served in the S.S.! Unless Stalin had issued an order to camp guards, that in the event of imminent capture, to execute all prisoners, to turn the gulags into death camps for real, Stalin had no choice but to shoot the very worst of the worst, Tukachevsky particularly. And it still didn't work, not entirely. But it did keep the world firmly rooted in modernity and avoided feudalist restoration (sic).
Allegory and Lumpen
some lumpen will get the allegory's hidden message. Others will not. The double message has to cut progressive both ways: so if I make a video about metaphors and you cannot see it is talking about Nazi activists as "lone wolves" and trying to capture them for our side, sorry, you missed the boat. Sun Tzu heavily influenced Mao: Sun Tzu correctly said that wars are won by capturing enemy resources and turning them against the enemy. Just as Hitler sought to turn Ukrainians into Nazis we can and do seek to get the enemy to become race traitors.
Bush and stupidity
Calling Bush stupid is itself stupid. The Bushes seized state power. So he isn't stupid. Get over yourself.
Email:
MIM said recently it has a problem with communication of people blabbing and sending TMI. MIM it is possible to use a PHP script to put an email box on a web page to which nothing could be attached, said emails would be text-only. Just saying.
"those with cryptic communication ability have a much higher belief on average in MIM's ability to shape the world, its power"
And in practice this is so: when MIM was not using cryptic communication MIM was much less interesting and much less effective. Did MIM bait the enemy into attacking it, did MIM lure the enemy into a weak position in order to decimate it? No idea! But it could of happened that way! And this is an example of correct authoritarian reasoning: I don't need to know whether MIM was setting up the feds big time. Though, I know Stalin set up Nazis. Stalin lured Nazis deep into Russia, let them outrun their supplies, then cut them off in the winter.
So MIM could have set up the feds. I never will know -- nor will the feds -- for if I knew that it would make it tougher for MIM to bushwhack the enemies next time.
Hey MIM, did you guys fuck up -- or what? LOL!
M
A
YBE!
"swamped versus swimming"
It sucks if MIMs shift is confusing others to the point of inaction. Anyone sidelined really should develop their own webpage. MIM struggled with Redstar and before him Satanists for a reason those people were active in the real world of practice though wrong on major line points.
"if we here in the united $tates water things down to be palatable to the Euro-Amerikan nation, especially in a bid to be majority-oriented, dumbocratic or libertarian, then we are forsaking the maximum revolutionary advantages obtainable. We do not want to be too close to the majority. "
That IS a guideline for making art. Thanks! :D I don't think I am too close to the majority. Others are welcome to criticize me but if others don't want to criticize me for fear of training fibbers no problem. I am perfectly okay not knowing that I get no feedback for that reason.
Do not water down! Put out the hard line Maoist message!
Why did I say (me say? this author say?) "People who thought "MIM BE dead" were simply very wrong."? That is an example of using the subjunctive + ghetto talk simultaneously to reach both the intellectuals and the lumpen (ghetto defendants). It's a two-for-one and the sort of thing MIM is expecting all comrades to "get" and do.
BTW The multiple parantheticals are a pomo tip.
Do I study neocon rhetoric? Of course. Does it help the struggle to ask fake questions? Only if it's cryptic.
To understand the struggle to hit the intellos and reach out to and lift up the lumpen we need to ask ourselves what is intellect? We communists know correct ideas do not fall from the sky, they are not innate, genetic or inborn. Correct ideas result from practical struggle with incorrect ideas. That is one reason the communist side will eventually and inevitably win: our enemies are blocked by their genetic elitism from developing all their potential resources. We can and should aim to get the lumpen "up to speed" it is why Mao taught literacy. All people are about equally intelligent, one more reason we're a bunch of fucking commies.
What is intellect? One aspect is the ability to encode and decode messages. Another aspect is creativity. What is creativity? Creativity is the promiscuous recombination of existing ideas to invent new ones. Intellectuals, that word I use, promiscuous, is not just metaphoric it is also literal as any lumpen so-called idiot will see. Artists want to stick their brushes in paint buckets and then smear paint on just about anything and yes that is a metaphor for fucking. Art is creative, the result of a promiscuous assault on the senses. Is this an indirect criticism of certain persyns? Duh.
But part of intellect is structure and discipline the ability to present a coherent message. Mere creativity, unfocussed undisciplined is anarchism or liberalism. It is a step forward from authoritarian feudalism. But it is not sufficient to get us out of blood soaked capitalism. We can expect lumpen to be creative and unfocussed. We can expect intellos to be focussed but uncreative. We need both aspects. I own you artistically because I know how to hit both levels at once and because I am more promiscuous. My critic's art is focussed but uncreative and generally hits only the intellectuals. Hitler said outright: >>ditch the intellectuals it's all practice baby<< and he was right about practice, possibly about the intellos. If lumpen or intellos should get priveleged I would privelege the lumpen struggle, not the struggle for intellos. We have plent of fascist intellos. I just dont see a lumpen protofascist movement, unlike in the labor aristocracy. Lumpen resgination to fate and indifference to consequences immunizes the lumpen against greed and fascism. Also lumpen are better at solidarity than labor aristocrats or l.a. wannabes.
How do authoritarianism/authoritarian "thinking" and creativity relate?
MIM recently has become authoritarian in some senses. MIM is making clear that some security struggles are going to be in the dark and others are going to be in the day and others will be in that shadow world of paranoia, metaphor, image-i-nation. This is why IRTR missed the boat and is playing sink-or-swim. They did not see the shift in tactics, the reason for that shift. Mao tells us plainly: we must take the enemy tactically dead serious. Those fuckers have guns and are trigger happy as we can plainly see. But we must also have strategic confidence in the proletariat because the exploited are the world's majority. We must likewise have contempt for the enemy strategically. The capitalists and imperialists, the war mongers, they are the real "dead enders". Rumsfeld was a dead ender. Jester Cheney is a dead ender. They represent a dying class, a dying world, and a world we are all too happy to help to die.
What is authoritarian reasoning?
Authoritarian reasoning is to look at intellect not as a function of disciplined coherent direction of creative promiscuity directed toward encoding and decoding messages. Rather it is to see being right as a function of one's social status in the society. For example, this minister had enormous strategic confidence in MIM when the hidden struggles of the past "X" years -- which struggles she did not see, not at all! -- finally broke lose on the surface. This minister played "follow the leader" the game of authoritarians everywhere. Where did that confidence come from? Why was it not misplaced? We certainly did not see such confidence among certain (all?) elements of IRTR!
This confidence arose from PRACTICE. Your Minister had been in constant struggle to understand MIM since years and Germoney since a decade (or more). She only recognized the warning signals of the past years, the reasons for MIMs actions, *after* the struggles became evident. Though This Minuister can "read between the lines" before the cryptic struggles became evident YM did not read MIM that way. MIM has not only said rtfm it also says "from now on WRITE between the lines". At which point YM knew -- read between the lines! Connect the dots! Put the ball in the hoop! This really liberated me from the need for direction, confirmation, reassurance that my line was more correct than Stalin's -- and it is. I can claim to be more correct than stalin because MIM thought is built on Mao who built on Stalin. I would have to deviate seriously from MIM line to be less correct than Stalin, and I don't pfft. So it isn't bragging or unrealistic to say YM is more correct than Stalin. It is also not an indirect critique of Stalin. MIM probably underestimates Stalin because of being blind to the cryptic struggles that happened in the 1930s. MIM knows that Stalin was 100% right to send all those fuckers to the gulag, especially after the recent rioting in Tallinn which revealed the ugly sad truth of post-revisionist neo-fascism in Eastern Europe. MIM does not read or write about Stalin enough for my liking. This is because Stalin has been succesfully smeared by the enemy, just like they are trying to paint a shit mustache on Mao today. Combatting the smearing of Stalin and Mao is a key task of the art ministry. Since we don't aim to get the majority in the imperialist lands we should be all the more willing to cheer Stalin. Indeed, Stalin is my homeboy!
Were the nameless renegades, the degenerates, the sectarian defectors, reading between the lines? Know idea. Good question. I doubt it. They underestimated MIM because of a lack of practice working with MIM. MIM was NOT engaging in authoritarian reasoning when it said something along the lines of "Mousnonya has been pumping out Maoism for years, don't have a cow". MIM was engaging in using practice as the guide to correct ideas, and people who missed that boat were using some other standard, probably an idealist one.
Allegories and Metaphors:
MIM is going to be writing between the lines, IMO till socialism, at least. I think allegorical writing under the JDOP may not be the way to go because it risks covering for capitalist restoration. That may be an example of how an idea dialectically transforms into its opposite under certain conditions. The correct idea of using allegorical/metaphorical struggle under capitalism maybe becomes the incorrect idea under socialism -- this is the sort of theoretical struggle where the cartesian intellectual renegades could make points now for battles 20-50 years in the future. Will they? I don't know.
Opponent Modeling
Yes, that is a keyword from artificial intelligence, feds MIM is not joking about Markov, im in ur packets cracking ur cipher, sniff sniff. MIM has also made clear that we must be able to see the world through the enemies' eyes. Hey, what happens when 2 or 3 universities computer labs start paralell processing ur cipher? Heheh.
MIM has been tolerant of this minister because I sure as hell can see through the enemy's eyes, at least some of them. MIM has been modelling the two main wings of imperialism recently, Hooverites vs. Rockefellers, though less developed models of liberals & libertarians also exist.
Werewolves & lone wolves
After the Nazis were defeated they tried to start guerilla armies. The ones in Eastern Europe got funded by the CIA and were troublemaking well into the 1950s, i.e. until the revisionist traitor Khruschev came to power. The video "Metaphors" hinted at that and now I draw the line for those that didn't bother following. Why did I do that, bait Nazis, taunt stupid renegade Maoists? Part of art is to seize the imagination. Maoists ARE in a multigenerational struggle against a bunch of fucking vampires. This was NOT the only reason. Nazis figured out something that MIM has or is figuring out, about struggling as a minority: we activists must be able to operate as "lone wolves" to land blow after blow in complete isolation with no support encouragement or even acknowledgement. Go ahead google
nazi lone wolves
and see what get's thrown up in your face. This is why MIM underestimates Stalin, a bit, we simply cannot see all the cryptic struggles of the 30s which explain why he was so bloody repressive. But we know the outcome. Fifth column? What fifth column. It is dead or in prison. Go Stalin! And before whining about why Stalin outright shot so many people tell me, if Japan invaded Russia instead of attacking Amerika what happens next? I will tell you what: Siberian labor camps get "liberated" and all those fifth columnists get armed by the Japanese and the fascists win the second world war. How Stalin maneuvered Japan into attacking the U.S. instead of the USSR is beyond our knowledge but he did and that forced the Nazis to go into hiding for about 20 years: The Nazi's grandchildren are ruling the world today.
Even after all the repression Stalin did, lots of Ukrainians nevertheless betrayed their country and served in the S.S.! Unless Stalin had issued an order to camp guards, that in the event of imminent capture, to execute all prisoners, to turn the gulags into death camps for real, Stalin had no choice but to shoot the very worst of the worst, Tukachevsky particularly. And it still didn't work, not entirely. But it did keep the world firmly rooted in modernity and avoided feudalist restoration (sic).
Allegory and Lumpen
some lumpen will get the allegory's hidden message. Others will not. The double message has to cut progressive both ways: so if I make a video about metaphors and you cannot see it is talking about Nazi activists as "lone wolves" and trying to capture them for our side, sorry, you missed the boat. Sun Tzu heavily influenced Mao: Sun Tzu correctly said that wars are won by capturing enemy resources and turning them against the enemy. Just as Hitler sought to turn Ukrainians into Nazis we can and do seek to get the enemy to become race traitors.
Bush and stupidity
Calling Bush stupid is itself stupid. The Bushes seized state power. So he isn't stupid. Get over yourself.
Email:
MIM said recently it has a problem with communication of people blabbing and sending TMI. MIM it is possible to use a PHP script to put an email box on a web page to which nothing could be attached, said emails would be text-only. Just saying.
"those with cryptic communication ability have a much higher belief on average in MIM's ability to shape the world, its power"
And in practice this is so: when MIM was not using cryptic communication MIM was much less interesting and much less effective. Did MIM bait the enemy into attacking it, did MIM lure the enemy into a weak position in order to decimate it? No idea! But it could of happened that way! And this is an example of correct authoritarian reasoning: I don't need to know whether MIM was setting up the feds big time. Though, I know Stalin set up Nazis. Stalin lured Nazis deep into Russia, let them outrun their supplies, then cut them off in the winter.
So MIM could have set up the feds. I never will know -- nor will the feds -- for if I knew that it would make it tougher for MIM to bushwhack the enemies next time.
Hey MIM, did you guys fuck up -- or what? LOL!
M
A
YBE!
"swamped versus swimming"
It sucks if MIMs shift is confusing others to the point of inaction. Anyone sidelined really should develop their own webpage. MIM struggled with Redstar and before him Satanists for a reason those people were active in the real world of practice though wrong on major line points.
"if we here in the united $tates water things down to be palatable to the Euro-Amerikan nation, especially in a bid to be majority-oriented, dumbocratic or libertarian, then we are forsaking the maximum revolutionary advantages obtainable. We do not want to be too close to the majority. "
That IS a guideline for making art. Thanks! :D I don't think I am too close to the majority. Others are welcome to criticize me but if others don't want to criticize me for fear of training fibbers no problem. I am perfectly okay not knowing that I get no feedback for that reason.
Do not water down! Put out the hard line Maoist message!
posted by Maoist Internationalist Movement at 9:58 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home