Conceptualizing a Structured, Orderly, and Safe U.S. Disengagement from South Central Asia

U.S. Imperialism is in a bad way. This can hardly be considered the fault of the ICM. However, the ICM and U.S. imperialism both have a common interest in seeing the U.S. get out of South Central Asia in as bloodless a fashion possible.

In that the U.S. imperialists created the mess of having betrayed all factions in Iraq in turns, and also by invading Iraq in the first place, the imperialists know the situation on the ground much better than the MIM. So they are in the position to already know better than the MIM just what to do. From the MIM side of the picture, MIM can trade a respectful silence for less blood. We can trade our sweat for your blood imperialists and that trade should go on the "we sweat more and you bleed less" side of the equation even though it could go just the opposite way. We will end sweatshops but triage makes clear, ending the wars the imperialist start is a higher priority than ending sweatshops. In that sense the imperialists operations in south central asia succeeded in extracting marginally greater labor from southeast asia than would otherwise have been the case. However, even the imperialists should now see that their labor extraction was less than their surplus value expenditures. That war was god damned expensive and not just in limbless farm kids.

So: we should give the imperialists in the administration transition a chance to withdraw from Iraq with as little violence as possible. Of course, having set up a heroin trafficking business in Afghanistan to yet again devastate the U.S. inner city and being afraid of the people that they have been killing the imperialists cannot disengage from Afghanistan so quickly as either side might want.

Very well, as to Afghanistan the U.S. will take up a policy of development aid in the urban areas and food aid via air-drops in the rural areas. Helping the Afghani people switch their economy from opium and gun production to textiles is what it's all about.

The fears the imperialists have of terrorist action should be contextualized. Imperialists know full well false flags actions do happen. The MIM has never taken up armed struggle in the first world. The MIM has never argued for the Third World to strike at the imperialist center. True, such struggle would be suicidal for the ICM but these wars have shown that there is a point where people are so desperate they don't mind dying for their family.

The imperialists may never understand that the Maoist war fighting strategy really is organized around war prevention. That the Maoist war tactic really is designed around taking and inflicting the fewest casualties possible. Just like we Maoists can melt your economy down we can also build Third World economies up. The Third World is the global majority. That demographic will not change: the Third World has been and will continue to outbreed the first world. At some point the numbers will decide the issue. AIDS as genetic warfare only went so far. Running a genocide is a difficult thing. Even with the genocidal AIDs weapon the first world is still outnumbered and becoming more outnumbered.

The first world can view it's encircled dependent position with fear or hope. Despite their pig nature, no one is calling for the extermination of the first world even though exterminationalism has always been the imperialists game. We're the anti-death side and you're welcome to take tips from us. Get out of Iraq. Let the Iraqi people(s) work things out on their own. You made the mess. Staying will only make it worse.