The Art Ministry Salutes Iron5STP!

http://youtube.com/profile?user=iron5stp

The Art Ministry has no right nor power to declare a person a Maoist Comrade. However Comrade Iron5STP Deserves a Red salute! Clench fists high for her videos.

Where is Iron5STP? Who is Iron5STP? Those are pig questions! No one knows! And no one need no. But striking out into the imperialist darkness a bright red light is warming the hearts of the world's exploited and striking fear and contempt into the heartless brains of the exploiters and oppressors.

Comrade Iron5STP was persistent and patient. She didnt' like the Ministry's Art. So she did something about it and made her own! That is artistic production. Iron5STPS first videos took weeks. But her next videos will take days. And then she will improve to the point where what once took days if not week will take hours.

Iron5STP is a shining example of taking up struggle and getting out there and doing something! Materialist practice beats theoretical whining every day. Every true Maoist should look at Iron5STPs videos to learn from their example and to encourage Iron5STP to striker ever harder until the murderous machine S.S. Imperialism sinks beneath the waves.

CLENCHED FIST SALUTE TO IRON5STP! :D RAISE THE RED FLAG HIGH!

Self criticism

Mousnonya is busy practicing field goals. Thus the lack of art production.

The Art Ministry is, at worst, petit bourgeois, and not imperialist. It is more likely lumpen. It’s self sustaining.

When MIM talks about cheerleaders on the sidelines it may (or may not) be referring to the great efforts of Shubelmorgan, MonkeySmashesHeaven, RAIM, RedTerror.

MIM has talked in the past about MacKinnon's pre-leninist line. Football practice involves working out how much of that line is mush. When MacKinnon argues there is a sexuality that doesn’t involve the cash-sex nexus she is being either naïve or disingenuous. MacKinnon’s public theoretical line may (or may not) diverge from her actual line. All sex involves $.

Ex CIA agent Duncan Kennedy even knows that all sex has a cash nexus. When ex CIA agent Duncan Kennedy takes the right perspective on the lack of a proletariat inside U.S. borders but also argues against Stalin (cryptically hidden under the moniker “kommunism”) that confirms 100% MIM's theory that

1) The State was willing to buy out ANYONE but Stalinists. That implies that Stalinism must be some hot shit, even better than rat shit or DU.
2) The U.S. petit bourgeoisie / social democrats are a deadly dangerous enemy willing to use social democracy as a tool to destroy the international communist movement. Duncan Kennedy raises the red flag to shoot people in the back. This is just what Mao meant when he talked about sugar coated bullets.
3) Ugly question in the accountability line: How many of DKs friends are ex operation phoenix? Hmm? I mean triggermen, not victims since obviously none of category B were.

Duncan Kennedy’s academic life has been an interesting thing. Stallin’ for time, so to speak. He has tenure. So why is his line so unscientific and backward on Maoism and dialectics? Uh, coz he’s trying to set you up for the kill, metaphorically speaking of course. All his triggermen budies are nicely compartmentalized in the sort of weberian bureaucratic specialization that by some strange coincidence seems to have become his idée fixe.

Cryptically speaking – if MacKinnon or Kennedy even write cryptically which they may well not! == MacKinnon is leaving Duncan Kennedy in the dust.

Openly speaking it is clear: Duncan Kennedy takes the social democrat stab-progress-in-the-back unscientific line. And this despite understanding
1) There is no Ameriklan proletariat at all.
2) There is no imminent revolution in U.S. borders.

When Duncan Kennedy talks about “rat shit” the rat bastard should reread the renegade Katusky. A renegat is a person who takes up one line, renounces it, and goes back to another. Duncan Kennedy is a great vector for imperialist sellouts to buy into the system. Of course, Ameriklans cannot sell out, they ARE the system. However DK could , if he wanted, steer Third Worlders to correct paths. Instead, he lines them up to be swept into globalization as more willing subreforming accomplices to imperialism.

Nice try DK. You might want to rethink ur line. I’m in ur Frankfurt, schoolin ur crits.

Notes on MacKinnon's line

Notes on MacKinnon's line

Incest is bootcamp for prostitution
most anti-porn activists were in pornography
trafficking, prostitution and pornography are equivalent
prostitution is rape for hire
prostitutes are slaves
consent is illusory - presumes coercion
obscenity

kids can consent
if prostitution is just a job what's wrong with kids doing it?

whorehouses are not empowerment centers.

MacKinnon thinks money is not involved in normal sex.
[What planet is she from ? Money in one way or another is all over sex in capitalism!]

Per MacKinnon more sex abuse is happening today and at younger ages.

-----
So MacKinnon says: All prostitution is rape.
But doesn't make the link that all sex is prostitution.
if all sex is prostitution and all prostitution is rape then all sex is rape.

MacKinnon on Eroticization of Power

The eroticization of power is a problem in that what is eroticized is an inequality of relation, what is eroticized is a domination, a control a deadly energy
(MacKinnon)

Power has of course both a positive and negative aspect, a good and evil side. Dialectics teaches us that opposites are united in relative or absolute conflict that this conflict ends either in the synthesis of the opposition (relative opposites) or in the destruction of one pole or the other (opposites in absolute conflict)
(mous, from Heraklites, Taoism, Marx & Engels)

Question to MIM: Are the positive and negative aspect of power a relative or absolute contradiction?
Mous argues: an absolute opposition! Because, creation results in a new higher state it is a dialectical synthesis at the higher level of the type described by Marx and Engels. What do you think?

Destructive power, the power of killing, of death machines of war machines is the negative evil aspect of power. (MacKinnon=>mous)

The positive constructive aspect of power is the power to build, to create. (mous=>MacKinnon)

It is this essentially good aspect of power that patriarchy consistently destroys in the service of capitalism. (mous)

MacKinnon=>mous: Foucault affirms the eroticization of power.

Mous: When Foucault talked of eros and power he almost certainly was praising the sense of power as self-mastery, self control, self-expansion, self-development. Of course, one can attack Foucault for being egoistic; yet the power eroticized by Foucault is most certainly not the eroticism of fascism which he both documented and clearly found repulsive. (mous)

The eroticization of domination, of inequality is evil. (MacKinnon; MIM; mous)

Mous's current line: The Eros, so obvious and evident in Mous's work is nothing more or less than an attempt to express healthy foucaultian desire, the desire to create to build to love and live healthily and happily.
True Eros, the positive power of the body to excel in sport and create beauty and order from violence and chaos is celebrated not destroyed in Mous's work.

Got a problem with that? Make better art. The correct line is hammered out in the struggle with the incorrect line.

KKKOLUMBUS DAY :(

Today is a black armband day for real reds everywhere. Today 500 years of empire, genocide and slavery are celebrated by whitey. Whitey made KKKolumbus day to try to whiten up the Italian immigrants and assimilate them into the empire. Italians should be proud of people like Sacco and Venzetti and call KKKolumbus a killer.

In honor of this day Catharine MacKinnon is giving a speech; the U.$. $tate department opposes child prostitution and sex tourism and normalization of prostitution. Okay, sometimes the enemy is on the right side of history. Mousnonya thinks normalization of prostitution would be better than keeping it dangerous and illegal but wtf do I know. Maybe MIM has a line worked out on whether to call prostitution, stripping, domina work sex work or not? Maybe MIM has a worked out line on whether to normalize prostitution. Mousnonya doesn't.

Soo all the whiners have a place to make points. What's your line on
sex work ?
normalization ?

coz you know your line is going to get reflected in the Ministry's art.

Speaking of which: Nice Photo Expo CKKC. Half of it is pornographic btw.

all sex is prostitution, and all prostitution is rape.

"Prostitution is open and to be preferred to mish-mash dishonest reasons given for relationships that also amount to exchange."

Thank you MIM for vindicating my line.
http://etext.org/Politics/MIM/gender/gender100507.html

Note: MacKinnon is against the use of the term "sex worker" as it normalizes prostitution. Yeah, well, bad news EVERYTHING in patriarchy is prostitution (and rape, for that matter since consent is ILLUSORY).



"the revolutionary principle is asexual"

Is asexual anti sex or just no-desire?

Also: All those sexualized represntations in mousnonya's art, (and mousnonya for that matter) are whores. Don't like it? Make something better.

"if the desire is not there. If desire is not there, better to be a prostitute and get paid for sex. At least then you could buy something you did intrinsically like."

Some prostitutes DO intrinsically like sex. And some workers are happily exploited.

Though, again, this is all vindicating my line. Don't like it? Make something better.