"If by rape we mean coercive sex then yes, sex under patriarchy is rape.

But the main defining characteristic in the world is imperialism, not patriarchy.

To champion an “all sex is rape” line is to muddle the primary contradiction. It’s essentially saying that all work under capitalism is oppressive or 'all childhood is abuse.'"

Maoists stress the principal contradiction because that is the torch of liberation we hold highest to guide the Third World out of imperialist wars of exploitation.
However, we Maos are unafraid to look for secondary contradictions. We just don't make a big deal out of secondary contradictions, precisely to avoid the confusion of which the persyn complains. But since there are no proletarians outside of prisons and reservations in the First World, and certainly no proletariat class we are forced to develop an analysis of secondary contradictions even though it's not what is globally most useful because it is all that is locally possible.

Contradictions like sex, gender, youth, are secondary. Inasmuch as race is a proxy for class in the First World it is not a secondary contradiction: the proletarians in the first world all have black hair, brown eyes and brown skin. There is however a white proletariat class in Russia (not the baltics). There are proletarians in the baltics but they are being turned into labor aristocrats at breakneck speed.

What's up with the secondary contradiction of youth? Indeed MIM does say youth are oppressed in the first world generally, even imperialist youth are treated as property.
What about the secondary contradiction of gender and sex?

MIM pioneered a very clear line, that gender and sex are not the same, that gender referse to identity and sex refers to biology and that both are distinct from sexuality. E.g. mousnonya has one gender, the opposite sex and hir sexuality is fluid.

First world bio wimmin are gendered male. They are dominators, oppressors and exploiters.
Third world bio men are gendered female. They are dominated, oppressed and exploited.

Of course, there are historic vestiges of exploitation of wimmin in the first world manifesting as sex and gender oppression.

Where is any of this unclear? It's counterintuitive but it is clear. Either it is wrong or it is right. Either it's the quickest way forward or it isn't.

"If we stick to MIM’s confused line on “all sex is rape,” any sex act between First-World men and women or any combination of the two is rape."

By jove I think she's got it! All sex is rape. What's so confused about that?
Yes, first worlders rape each other all the time.
What planet are you on if you don't see that?
Look, if you're not meeting people who have been raped with violence it's because you're an insensitive brute, really, with no ability to listen and part of the problem. It's that simple. Rape, even by bourgeois standards, is commonplace in the first world.

"First-World men and women also occupy the same strata in the Gender Aristocracy."

This is why we see men going to the police and complaining of being raped and then getting laughed at ignored and raped again, but only metaphorically. Oh wait, that's not what really happens. First world bio wimmin are exploiters and oppressors and oppressed. What part of "cross cutting cleavages" doesn't make sense?

feminism & queer liberation

Letters from the 3d World:
"What do you call a persyn who cant open up to society because s/hes homosexual, and is scared to be persecuted by hir family and stuff.

opening up is like life and death situation?
self-suppression is neccessary so the juvenile homo can still live with hir parents, and choose to open-up in a later time(or when parents are dead), when she is already self-sustaining?

this is weird?"

"that was a real thing. in most patriarchal societies. fathers would rather kick the homo kid out of the family. black sheep tag or something, cutting financial support(witch i cant imagine), and physical abuse to the maximum.

I would kill anyone who beats me up, but i cant cos they feed me. lol "


Your questions are not wierd, they are in fact a life and death issue: Queer people get killed for being Queer and isolated and repressed all the time even in the first world.

But, Queer people in the first world are not exploited for their labor.
I try to distinguish oppression from exploitation. Queer people get oppressed all the time even in the first world. But no person in the first world gets exploited except in prisons or internal semi-colonies.

I don't know how to help people in the Third World to be tolerant and good to each other. Of course, the pigs in the first world are going to use Feminism and Queer liberation as ways to split the Third World apart in order to exploit it better. As long as the first world tries to exploit the third world any efforts at queer liberation are going to get abused or misunderstood.

Those pigs in the first world seem more liberated and freer but that's only because they have stolen all that wealth from Third World sweatshops and mines. Since they are not starving they can afford to tolerate diverse lifestyles. Queer liberation in the first world is the result of the exploitation of the Third World.

:(

-----
"Any reviews on Madonna except amerikkkan pie, i like her voice, i dont like her being an amerikan slut. I can relate to her slutty songs though. "


Yeah, Madonna is annoying because 90% of the time she rocks and then she whores it all out for imperialism. I'm okay with her being a slut =) but when she's an amerikan imperialist slut i just want to put her up against some wall and hose her down with cold water, then send her to a reeducation camp.

After I saw amerikkkan pie i just stopped paying attention to her because that is i think an imperialist trash song.

Do you think i misinterpreted her? She has pictures of marines and cops and amerika's flag so I figure she's an imperialist 'ho, pimping out Queer's for the enemy. If there were a revolution she would still be encouraged to produce art but none of it would be shown publicly without being reviewed. She has a line that is at best 40% correct. She has done pro Queer and anti-imperialist work but as soon as she sees the anti-imperialist work doesn't fly -- she pulls it. And I just explained how being pro-Queer can be pro imperialist. So I think she sucks more than she rocks. I feel betrayed and disappointed by her.

Re: Iron5

I have to say I am not MIM's ex-Art Minister. MIM has never asked me to step down or anything like that. I'm still MIM's Art Minister and am a member of Maoist Studies Group.

MIM has said that each cell must be independant, and that's something I said a year ago too, that the Art Ministry is pursuing independant operations until the Chair reconvenes the Central Committee in about 2 years or issues orders otherwise. I only very recently retitled the Art Ministry the Maoist Art Ministry hoping that then MSH and other splinters would work out their line with MIM -- that would be a "united front" as opposed to sectarianism which might be one thing the Chair wants before taking any action about the Art Ministry. Renaming would have given them a way to "disown" the Art Ministry (or not).

MSH hasn't moved closer to etext: in fact, MSH has moved in a principled but wrong manner to a clearer but incorrect MSH line. MSH proposes stupid tactically moves that will result in strategic defeat. :(

I also changed the name of the MIM Art Ministry because I was thinking maybe of making the Ministry public. I decided that would not advance the struggle after all. It was a question of whether to use the art to outright finance the Art Ministry - which isn't going to be the case. The Art Ministry is self financing, it's not funded by PIRAO and that won't change but the question was whether to finance through the Art or other ways. Other ways were chosen because they are better security.

Retitling was also due to financial and propaganda considerations this way:
The Art Ministry has not decided how/when to debut on pornotube because a) there is money in that. Sex sells. b) I'm still willing to give the splitters the benefit of the god damned doubt, to consider MIM's line on pornification as potentially corrupted by police infiltration. Though, it IS my line that we can use the eroticization of constructive power to smash the eroticization of death and it's destructive power. 90-95% of the Art Ministry's production is dead serious. 5-10% is disinformation. I would actually prefer there to be 0% disinformation however our enemies have created situations that force us to use metaphoric / cryptic / allegorical styles -- which is okay for the Art Ministry but really makes me wonder if I should always read MSH's theory lines straight-on or look for clues of cryptic struggles the Art Ministry isn't and won't be involved in. That's also why I said some persynal biographical information so that way people won't wonder whether they know mousnonya. No one knows mousnonya. Mousnonya is anonyMous. :D And I love it! Also I wanted people to see how biography can influence artistic production since Maos haven't developed an adequate theory to explain how the individualist/liberal/anarchist/decadent tendencies of just about all artists can be worked into the movement. MIM has said it clearly gets "panned" by lots of different high powered artists but none of these artists stick around to struggle. I try to present theories of persynality and production that might explain that but they are tentative "guestimates".

I'm sorry about the confusion. It was me trying to give both MIM and MSH a way to dissociate the Art Ministry from Maoism in case the MIM Chair or even the Central Committee were to want to do that. I did say a year ago, some of the Art Ministry's work *is* disinformation so I think it was fair what I did. I accept full responsability on this. I have said all the time the Art Ministry is in centralism with the etext cell.

I know it's disappointing to see Prachanda is a sellout, a failed Maoist. Well, we just have to keep struggling against imperialism. Today Prachanda sells out but maybe tomorrow we get an Islamic Maoism, Islamists who start to look hard and well at Mao! THAT would make the imperialists quake! :D

So as suddenly as it seems we are losing we dialectically transform into the winners. Lenin in 1916 looked like a total fucking loser. Surprise he won! :D Hamas in 2005 looked like it was doomed to lose and then kicked the I$raelis in the teeth.

More on rape

monkeysmashesheaven.wordpress.com wrote:

"1. The contradiction between adult first-world males and females is non-antagonistic (within the same nation). Both are part of a global gender aristocracy."

First-world bio wimmin are gender male. There is no contradiction in the gender strand but there is a contradiction in the biology strand.
That contradiction is antagonistic, because almost all sex abuse is perpetrated by bio men against bio wimmin.

"2. First worlders as a whole, male and female, accrue privileges by jointly oppressing the third world."

But, the division of the spoils goes more to the bio men than to the bio wimmin. That split can be exploited.

"4. Alternative gender language promulgates the myth that adult first-world females are significantly oppressed such that they can be aligned with the oppressed nations against imperialism."

Alternative spellings have a technological impact -- that has changed very recently and decisively due to search engines. If you want your Maoist line to show up loud and clear on a search engine use the alternative spelling. If you want to hide your line then use the oppressor's spelling. The use of alternative spellings should be determined tactically. We need the alternative spellings just to mark out truly Maoist material. Sometimes it will be good to hide the Maoist influence in our thought. Most times we want the Maoist influence in our thought to show up really clearly.

"5. It is wrong to characterize all sexual relationships in stark terms such as “rape,”"

All sex in the entire world is prostitution. All prostitution is rape on the installment plan, rape light. You might want to distinguish rape with ultraviolence from rape light. You can easily get frat boys and sorority girls to laugh a minute about raep.

The Art Ministry has not yet developed a line on humor and revolution. This is why their isn't any satire. While persynally I find jokes about being raped cathartic I don't know how other rape victims feel. Also, for propaganda purposes the Art Ministry may go "above ground". So Your Minister is happy to talk about her nasty experiences involving rape light, ultraviolence, "exotic" dancing, prostitution and her friends and lovers experiences of rape with ultraviolence.

This sort of inquiry leads straight to pig questions.
Since the Art Ministry knows no comrades in real life (IRL) there is not any problem from the Art Ministry's perspective. However, the Art Ministry doesn't want your biographical stories. The Art Ministry does want your fucking art.

"cases of sex tourism are qualitatively different than ordinary encounters between first-world adults."

Little brown girls are cheaper, prettier (no wrinkles, just bruises and makeup takes care of that) and don't complain as much or as effectively when you throw in the ultraviolence. It's a question of degree not type.

>>Secondly, calling all sex “rape” because there is always a power difference between sexual partners in the first world is analogous to the Trotskyist claim that the first-world labor aristocracy is exploited just because there is a difference in power between the first-world labor aristocracy and first-world capitalists.<<

^This is a stupid way of thinking. It tries to analyze based on what is expedient, what is effective. We won't figure out what rape is by thinking about what effects our characterizing acts as rape or not will have. We have to think about what was done to us (or what we did to others) and why.

"Thirdly, calling all sex “rape” obscures the fact that adult first-world females benefit overall from their relationships, including their personal relationships, with adult first-world males."

Prostitutes benefit all the time from being raped. Exploited labor in the Third World benefits all the time from being exploited. Having a good day in bed is like having a good day in the rice paddies. You're still up to your ankles in shit but at least the sun is shining.

"Fourthly, the claim that “all sex is rape” panders to the gender aristocracy and bourgeois fake-feminism."

That makes sense.

I'm not sure if MSH or PrairieFire wrote this (and I really don't care, truth is independant of the observer and we should all be anonymous anyway)

"Just because one can’t list finite criteria to distinguish between the consensual and the non-consensual does not mean that there are not paradigmatic instances of both."

I can't believe I ever took this bitch seriously. Bitch, your shit stinks. It's unscientific. If you can't make the cut you're not a scientist, stfu and get out of the way.

"why bother with all the confusion in the first place? Why not just say that all human behavior, including sex, is coercive in various ways?"

Because not all human behavior is sex.
And because the problems of exploitation and oppression are global not individual.
It's like MSH is thinking tactically and so projecting that onto MIM.
MIM didn't get to "all sex is rape" by thinking "what would get the most votes" or even "what would advance the Maoist line best". It got there by looking at "all sex is prostitution" -- which it very obviously is -- and then trying to figure out what differentiates prostitution from rape -- and then figuring out the degree of violence, not the reality of violence.

If you're not a streetwalker it just means your pimp-rapist is your husband or the cop or both. Got bruises?

"It is intellectually dishonest and idealist."

No, it's materialist: we look at the world and we see a nexus of sex-cash and we also a nexus of sex-violence and we notice an overlap and then it's a question whether that overlap is in fact 100%. MIM says it is. Liberals would say there is not always a sex-cash nexus. MacKinnon believes that such is at least possible and such should be the goal, sex without cash. I think sex without cash means I go hungry. So I have a lumpen perspective and MacKinnon has a bourgeois imperialist perspective. She's the idealist, not MIM. I doubt we can get beyond the sex-cash nexus in our lifetime. I do think we can get beyond the sex-violence nexus though maybe *that* is idealism, hoping for more than is possible. After all, I have trouble distinguishing pimps and cops.

"I was defending a line that I knew to be muddled and flawed when IRTR first started."

Don't ever do that again. It's fucked up.

"FdaPatriarchy said:

In four words you destroy every individualist and subjective argument that there is “good” sex under patriarchy."

Caring about 'good' sex is bourgeois. Is 'good' sex politically correct or orgasmic? There is NO 'good' sex under imperialism by either standard because you're either wargasming or you're asexualized. If there is NO good sex doesn't that sound like 'All sex is rape'?

"Saying all workers are exploited leads us in a bad direction, saying all sex is rape does not."

This too is backwards thinking. What do you SEE and FEEL and HEAR out there in the REAL WORLD? Do you see a lot of people screaming and crying and cumming? And getting slapped around and cut up and maybe partly hating and partly liking it? Therapists are trained to teach victims that it's normal to experience some pleasure when raped. I'm sort of shocked no one has said this yet but I just did and if you want citations that's fine. MIM rejected *bourgeois* psychology. But MIM recognized that when psychology can help comrades keep alive and not kill themselves or die in focoism then it's a tool we need. So yeah, bourgie psychologists teach rape victims that it's okay to have felt pleasure when being raped because it's the bodies mechanical reaction.
What I see out there is a lot of fucking rape that's what I see.
And anyone wants to try to convince me I'm wrong is gonna find out quickly they're wrong.

"If all sex is rape, then maybe the subjective experience of a first world biowimmin could lead to an alliance with the proletariat."

More fucked up backwards thinking. You are both putting the cart before the horse.

Why did you both ditch materialism?
What do you SEE and FEEL and HEAR in the REAL WORLD
not in your fucked up machinations about politics or ideas or ideology.
Do you see people with scars and bruises and abortions or what?

"it’s often a good sign this persyn is not serious and is only taking a pornographic interest in our line"

It's still backwards because MIM says rightly that ANYTHING can be sexualized. We cannot NOT have a porno conversation at the same time we talk about sex. If you want to complain about pornification complain about it dumbing things out into spamalot.

"I still wonder what your new definition of rape is."

ME TOO. Coz I expect it will be bourgeois :(

What is GOOD hamburgers and GOOD cadillacs under imperialism?
That's how meaningful the question of GOOD sex is.
What's the difference between a cadillac, a humvee and a tank?
That's the same thing as 'good' sex, prostitution, and rape. It's all part of the same evil fucked up twisted war-for-profit-and-wargasms that any sane person knows is the road to species extinction.

"Yes, that is a start. And, do you advocate throwing everyone on planet Earth who has had sex, or at least half of them, into prisons? Yes or no."

What, work camps are off the table? MIM already was ready to write off the entire first world to being resettled in work camps in the Third World.

Persynally I like the alternative spellings because they scare off the enemy who decides to write the Maoists off as stupid. That's awesome and alone justifies "miss"spelling the words.


>>The label “rape” has a universally negative stigma attached to it. It is wrong and misleading to apply it to typical cases where both partners benefit from their sexual interaction as gender aristocrats.<<

Are you telling me Janet Jackson, Paris Hilton, and any number of hollywood starlets aren't whores? Bullshit. They're whores and what's more they know it. Same here btw.

The Art Ministry needs stats on prisons: The Black Book of Capitalism?

Does MIM or the prison ministry have handy statistics on prison labor and wages?
MIM essentially argues that prisoners are paid exploitation wages and that the prisons are self financing through exploitation of prisoner labor.
The Art Ministry needs the hard statistical evidence of all that, the sooner the better please.
It would also be good to have hard contemporary statistical data on costs of capital punishment versus costs of imprisonment.
MT 11 is about 15 years out of date.
I can find stats on races and prisons fine but it's the labor exploitation aspects that are evading me.
Thanks!

Paul McCartney, Pipes of Peace (remix) Happy New Year

What do you say? Will the human race be run in a day? Or will someone save this planet we're playing on? Is it the only one?

In the First World War the communists told all peoples in all nations not to fight. Because there was still the remnants of white proletariat (and more than remnants in Russia) and because the imperialists had less stolen wealth to divvy up with their so called worker allies the imperialists had to deal with mutinies and desertions. This video tries to point all that out.

All people fighting in imperialist armies should either desert, subvert, and spy. U.S. out of Iraq! U.S. out of Afghanistan! Right your congresscritter!

MSH Degenerates Gracelessly :(

> MIM, before its freak-show degeneration

MSH mainly seems at least to me to be calling MIM's "freak show degeneration" based on the hard hitting action of the Art Ministry.

> MIM never really put forward a comprehensive framework for understanding gender.

MIM pointed out that MacKinnon was pre-leninist and took up the line that MacKinnon never took up, yet got mediaraped for. (yes, the Art Ministry constructs words; get used to it agglutinative languages are better in bed).


> MIM Theory magazine and MIM’s web page contained disparate and provocative writings on gender.

Provocative, yes. It is right to rebel! But disparate? Facts please.

> Flawed as they were
More general pissing and baseless allegations by MSH :(

> MIM’s writings on gender were far superior to the boilerplate liberalism of the fakes.
Yes.

> MIM’s writings contained various contradictory and muddled positions on gender issues.

ORLY? Struggle results in exposition of the incorrect and correct line! MIM addressed and rejected numerous incorrect lines. That's what struggle looks like. It's not muddled it's Democratic Centralism. P.S. note how MSH never once attacked Mousnonya/Art Ministry for not following democratic centralism on the gender line. That would have been the principled Maoist line of Attack on the Art Ministry, and the principled Maoist term for that is Deviationism. If MSH said "Mousnonya is a deviationist not practicing democratic centralism" then we would have been able to fight out that other line issue that MSH, ShubelMorgen and the other Splitters have avoided and one that does need answered: What is Maoist Art
Maoist Art is Art Made by Maoists! That's a liberal looking answer but it ain't! Why? Democratic centralism, that key concept the splitters abandoned with their premature "MIM is dead and evil" line ditched back at the starting gate. Oops.

> MSH is producing a stand-in gender line

MSH says "stand-in" you know like a bad actor who's been bad jacketing and now needs a new roll. MSH really means "stand down". Well, it would be better to Maoist science if we fought this out where it belongs
A. Democratic Centralism
B. How REVOLUTIONARY Art is best produced
C. Sex vs. Rape vs. Prostitution
D. Deviationism

With typical first world unscientific pornofascism MSH is able to see this only through it's gonads and focuses on point D.

Here, liner notes for those interested in hard hitting Maoist Science.

until we can develop a consistent scientific framework for gender:

> 1. The contradiction between adult first-world males and females is non-antagonistic (within the same nation). Both are part of a global gender aristocracy.

Then why are the men not getting raped by the women?
While one can fairly agree with 1 one can also disagree. P.s. this is why MIM never made gender a cardinal issue -- unlike MSH and the splitters.

> 2. First worlders as a whole, male and female, accrue privileges by jointly oppressing the third world.

Yes, and MIM definitely said this when it talked about how it is that divorced women can extract superprofits from their divorcing husbands. But waitaminute isn't divorce a bit of an antagonistic contradiction, just like rape?
And hey, is fidelity and childbearing and childraising an absolute contradiction?
Until men can get pregnant and raped by women I think they are relating to each other in an absolute contradiction UNDER CAPITALISM
We will know we have move to socialism when the antagonistic contradiction between men and women transforms (dialectically) into a relative contradiction. Absolute contradictions cannot be harmonized. Capitalism cannot resolve gender contradiction in the first world even within the oppressor nation that's how fucked up it is.

The contradiction, though absolute is not principal. MIM never said the principal contradiction globally was men versus women. That would be MacKinnon on Maoist steroids. MacKinnon doesn't have a principal contradiction (anymore) though when younger she likely would have put the global principal contradiction as men-against-women. Now she is seeing it as at least as much first-world-against-Third-World.

> 3. First worlders, including first-world females, are enemies of the third world generally, including third-world females.

More exactly:
3. First worlders, including first-world females, are generally enemies of the third world, including third-world females.
That language is changed to reflect the UNITY of the Third World as object of exploitation by the First World.
Also it's worth pointing out a lot more first world bio males are going to be enemies than first world bio-females.

I also wonder what MSH thinks about "women in the first world are gendered male; men in the first world are gendered female". That's MIM's line and there is nothing unclear or devious about it.

> The myth of a “universal sisterhood” between first and third-world females is a reactionary tool to divide national liberation movements.

Likely, imperialists have enough resources to hijack most every progressive first world movement with one notable exception...

> 4. Alternative gender language promulgates the myth that adult first-world females are significantly oppressed such that they can be aligned with the oppressed nations against imperialism.

Mousnonya started to pioneer the distinction EXPLOITED and OPPRESSED
Some nations are both exploited and oppressed. Iraq is both exploited and oppressed.
Other nations, such as the Turks (not the Kurds) and Mexicans are exploited economically yet their culture is basically tolerated. It's hard to see why you have Turkish fascists untill you see that imperialism can cut a cultural deal with Third World Nationalisms not oppressing aspects of the dominated culture in order to exploit it's labor!
Other groups are oppressed but not exploited. Queer's in the first world are not exploited, even Lesbian queers. However homosexuals EVERYWHERE are oppressed!
If MSH takes up this distinction that would be progress. It explains how a comprador class can flourish and effectively exploit it's own people all the while feeling good about itself.

> 5. It is wrong to characterize all sexual relationships in stark terms such as “rape,” terms with universally negative connotations. It is wrong for various reasons, including:

Mousnonya took up the line that ALL SEX IS PROSTITUTION
MSH better make a stand on this pronto. It's well worked terrain.
HOWEVER MIM pointed out that all prostitution is rape!
And that the idea of consent is rather meaningless.
How many bio women do you know with rape fantasies? Lots.
Some bourgeois psychologists argue that rape is a part of natural selection, ensuring that the strongest mate with the strongest. Mousnonya isn't going there. I'm happy to keep it all at the level of whores doing what whores do.

> Firstly, such a characterization of all sexual relations as “rape” is trivial and virtually meaningless.
Trivia: Does MSH know what trivial really means? It's not computationally trivial.
Trivia: Are "meaningless" and "trivial"the same?
Trivia: Does trivia derive from the Roman word for three roads, where witches were said to cast spells into past, present and future?
Trivia: Was the word Trivia trivialized by catholic patriarchy to destroy the words feminist content?

> It is overly reductionist.
^Redundant. You can't be "overly" reductionist. Learn English monkey.

Though, I am okay if the line turns into "All sex is prostitution" since there is a qualitative difference to someone being forced to have sex at gunpoint and getting slapped around versus having sex with that same person thereafter in exchange for money (real world example; lots of whores were raped, often as children).
Since most sex workers were sexually abused, somehow, the line "all sex is prostitution" bleeds quickly into the line "all sex is rape". Good luck with that distinction MSH I don't see either line changing work of real Maoist significantly.
Such a characterization stretches the meaning of the term “rape” as to strip it of any explanatory power. It obliterates important distinctions like why cases of sex tourism are qualitatively different than ordinary encounters between first-world adults.

> Thirdly, calling all sex “rape” obscures the fact that adult first-world females benefit overall from their relationships, including their personal relationships, with adult first-world males.

What, you never heard of a whore getting paid for being raped?

> Fourthly, the claim that “all sex is rape” panders to the gender aristocracy and bourgeois fake-feminism.

Ok.

> 6. Gender is not biological; it is a social construct.

YES.

> 7. It is important to oppose bourgeois fake-feminism, especially crypto-Trotskyism in gender forms, especially since Amerikkka, the Great Satan, is waging a crusade against the Islamic world.

OH YEAH. Seeing this through the eyes of the Third World makes lots of things clearer.

> Questions about lifestyle are generally sub-reformist.
NO! QUESTIONS ABOUT LIFESTYLE ARE PIG QUESTIONS
Is MSH blurring the distinction between "what is a pig question"? Looks like it to me.
Why would anyone want to blur that distinction?

> MSH has no line on how revolutionaries should specifically conduct their personal relationships and sexual lives other than the line that revolutionaries should evaluate their lifestyles through the lenses of security and image.

WHAT THE FUCK?!?!
MIM has a line called "forever monogamy". MSH just decides to piss all over that and claim that MIM is degenerated? ROFL lMAO.

> MSH’s line is that security and image are the main criteria for assessing why one lifestyle is better than another for revolutionaries in the first world.
Security, yes, but image no: WE ARE NOT TRYING OR ABLE TO GAIN A MAJORITY IN THE FIRST WORLD. So... image (even identity CGI LOL) are irrelevant.

> Obviously, certain lifestyle choices, in terms of security and image, are incompatible with serious revolutionary work.
^SMUGGLING HOMOPHOBIA IN THROUGH THE BACK DOOR.

> Individual cells will have a better idea about where to set the bar on these issues in their own contexts.

^DITCHING DEMOCRATIC CENTRALISM

Well, this isn't the way to frame the issues but at least MSH is finally doing something other than throwing baseless general allegations around. Let's see how well we can coerce MSH whether pigs or friends into doing good Maoist work.

New Videos

Salvo:

Peaches: Fuck the Pain Away



Peaches: Fuck or Kill



Immigrant Song: Surface!


Thanks for the resources BND! Or was that Mossad? :D Either way the movement appreCIAtes it!


Dialectical Materialism and Art:

Andy Warhol was a fag. He had obvious blowjob lips. :D

And now to the science....

Sectarianism is when one pushes identity above agenda, when one does not unite with forces that are driving to the same goal. For example I see the work of Monkey Smashes Heaven. (MSH) There are two possibilities: MSH is a pig wrecker, or MSH is a sincere communists. Now in either case the objective is the same, to get MSH to do as much good revolutionary work as possible. That doesn't mean we unite with pigs. It means we sucker pigs into doing as much work for us as possible, in devoting as many resources to us as possible. Seizing enemy resources is the name of the game.

Now, let's give MSH the benefit of the god damned doubt, it's my good natured habit. Either MSH is an effective presumed communist or MSH is an ineffective presumed communist. We judge people based on their actions more than their words because liars exist. Talk is cheap. That is materialism, to judge things on real-world standards. So if MSH is rallying the entire world into a united front pushing Maoism and opposing Prachanda then I would say at worst MSH is a pig organization being suckered into doing effective Maoist work. Of course, the constant pissing in the wind and pissing on other Maoists that MSH does is really annoying but somehow I think that won't stop real Maoists.

So in other words MSH you're willing to declare a non existent unity with Iron5STP. It's embarrassing to you and distressing to me. If MSH wants to act like it's all about building fake non-existent alliances they are acting like an ineffective pig would act.

That's the essence of Maoist tactics, making sure we win under any circumstances. MSH: I would share the letter that Iron5 sent me but the thing is I don't feel like embarrassing you publicly beyond saying things like pfft. After all: you might be a sincere maoist and not an ineffective pig.

Also, I have only praise for ShubelMorgan's latest video.

Iron 5 & Security

Well I'll be. Airmobile. Comrade Iron5 has hir* own webpage!

Iron5 asked "how do I make Maoist art" and the answer is practice. All real knowledge only comes out of getting out there and practicing it in the real world.

Meanwhile Monkey Smashes Heaven is claiming they can't know for sure just what Iron5 is saying.

ORLY?

Here,
Iron5's website in Engrish! :D (Automatic tagalog translation on line)

And if you really don't trust that, here, have some free Tagalog online dictionaries.

On the security front: don't use internet explorer, do use firefox. Then,
TOR (click here) to install for windows, here to install for Macintosh OSX 10.3, 10.4, 10.5 or here for linux.

Tor won't work without privoxy but the links above include privoxy. You must run both and have chosen a proxy you trust for it to work.
PRIVOXY
DISTRUST
FOXYPROXY
Track Me Not (Install TMN extension)

I haven't had much luck with either anonymizer or keyscrambler, two other firefox privacy extensions so I am not linking them. However you might want to check them out. The thing is YOU have to be your own security.

If I don't see Monkey Smashes Heaven reproduce this information I will be convinced they are sectarian smashers because they could easily have posted links to tagalog and just as easily could reproduce this information. What does MIM say?

Oh, btw, I'm moving toward Reichian views on sex. MIM do you want me to actually struggle through Reich? I would rather make art and am but haven't released any since it's not been necessary and I didn't want to do the wrong thing. Pointers from the party would be appreciated.