Review: Foreign Affairs

Dear Chevron & of course Lockheed Martin Marietta Military Industrioil Complex:

Thanks for the info drop, really. Your Minister doesn’t usually read foreign affairs; why bother, deck chairs on the titanic and all.

Still the article you want read about Iraq deserves mentioning.

Messrs. Biddle, O’Hanlon and Pollack may think themselves well meaning bourgeois internationalists, the sort of people MIM would like to give a pass to but. But no, they aren't. They might be trying, but, alas, fail.

Robert Kagan in counterpoint should just be taken out and shot. Metaphorically speaking, of course.

MIM appreciates the bourgeoisie’s strategic ineptitude in every sense of the word appreciate (lol capital). The problem is, though your strategic ineptitude is laughable, it also carries a cost in blood no one particularly likes.

Biddle et al. argue for 50% U.S. troop withdrawels by 2011. Those figures are simply unacceptable. Their argument is that an earlier withdrawel would result in more bloodshed. What they cannot recognize due to an absence of class analysis is:
1) The U.S. started the Iraq war and is the source of Iraq instability because it sequentially supported and betrayed each and every political force in Iraq. NO ONE LIKES YOU.
2) MIM isn’t trying to unify all sides in Iraq to carry out military strikes against imperialism whether in Iraq or elsewhere. MIM Could do that. So the last year of peace and stability hasn’t been due to the surge. It’s been due to MIM working for war prevention in Iran rather than war escalation in Iraq (and elsewhere). This Minister has already argued that we have nothing to lose: so the strategic analysis of Messrs Biddle is wrong.
3) All those U.S. armed and trained Iraqis? Thanks for the weapons, gtfo.

Basically, the least bloody option is complete immediate withdrawel. MIM has not tried to tie down the imperialists in Iraq to exacerbate their sorry fucked up global slouch. MIM could easily pump up the volume for propaganda and political line to bring on a full scale war between the Arab (and even Moslem) peoples and the imperialists. MIM doesn’t want that because MIM wants peace. However the sort of back-sliding presented by Messr’s Biddle et al. is a “combat enabler” for This Minister.

While we are on the back channel: MIM is pleased to note the brilliant development idea of turning Guatemalen cane sugar into bourgeois SUV juice. Run with that. MIM doesn’t like brutal military dictatorships. However, MIM knows that development leads to peace. When MIM sees effective healthy bourgeois policies that reflect and cause reduced violence in the Third World we are ok with that. Guatamala has a brutal record of human rights atrocities. Probably a bunch of poor, angry, desperate people struggling to have a decent life. While corn based biofuel isn’t viable cane based fuel is. MIM predicts that a decent living standard for all Guatamalans will be healthy for everyone even people pigmerika. We'll whine less about Guatamala if we see progress in life expectancy, caloric intake, i.e. real improvements in the living standard for the poor.

Your Minister is simply pointing out that contrast between flailing bourgeois politicos who are strategically blind and correct bourgeois tactical private sector economists with a hope that we can see a better tactical vision in Guatemala (end death squad government). Rather than bourgeois intellectuals MIM continues to contemplate whether in fact the bourgeois corporate sectors have the better vision. This issue of foreign affairs seems to indicate that is the case.

Finally a caveat: I'm an artist not an expert on the mideast or latin america. MIM is always free to countermand or order this Minister to do or refrain from doing anything. I just try to make it clear.

Also: there is a really cool wall art displayed on Brattle street. It's worth a lookie.

Helping the Imperialist Unfuck themselves ?

For eight years now MIM has labored in struggle toward a crypto fascist agenda -- principally the Bush family. Happily, Bush junior was about as incompetent as we can ever hope for.

The fascist Bushies figured out that to hold power they had to ditch the overt racist agenda of fascism. Bushies take note: that is an example of truth emerging out of dialectical struggle. Fascism 1.0 thought it had to have a racist ideology, either as a smokescreen of ideology or in a good faith desire to achieve their version of what Marxists call "new Soviet man" which they called "Superman". Yes, we want to remold the human race, to make it stronger, better, faster. We only call out the fascists on that when they try to push one race down; their "positive" racist agenda --killing the insane, the handicapped and then jews and Slavs -- will never be tolerated again, thankfully. When the fascists push "zero population growth" they are really pushing third world immigration to the first world, intentionally or not.

When fighting the inhumane elements of fascism it is important to know when to shut up and when to pass on protips.

The left wing brand of corporatism is about to take power in the U.S. -- barring massive scandal that is. This means that MIM will be facing more competent enemies.

However omfg the imperialists war map and battle plan is just as fucked on the left as it is on the right.

So consider this another open letter -- we shed ink in order that there will be less bloodshed in your fucked up insane sadomaso wargasm casino sex slavery, capitalists.

1) Stop conceptualizing the war on terror as a war. It isn't. When you tried to fight it as a war in Iraq, you lost. Instead of the neocon lie of easy victory and unleashing economic liberalism under secular democracy you got the mess called Iraq - not regime change throughout the mid east. Whether you call that deliberate zionist machination or not is irrelevant to the facts.

2) Get out of Iraq and Afghanistan. No on who lives there is particularly able to or even hoping to nuke Chicago. Even if MIM had a nuclear weapon we wouldn't use it because we don't see that as the way to provoke the changes imperialism needs to stop being a mass murderer. This was stated in detail in a previous letter.

Thereto MIM gets a protip: Why do you think Germany in the1940s declared war on the U.S. and sunk so many resources into rocketry -- to the extent of developing submarine launched cruise missiles.

Also the nazi nuclear weapon was used at Kursk (Procharovka). Stalin threatened chemical warfare as retaliation were it ever used again. If the FSB would release any and all documents on the Nazi nuclear and rocketry program MIM would be grateful.

MOVIE REVIEW - FATHERLAND

Fatherland is a 'fictional' account of what would have happened had the Nazis won world war 2 by
a) Using their type XXI submarines to blockade England instead of as transports to transport gold, blueprints, financial instruments, and personnel to South America.
b) Using their nuclear weapons on London as well as Russia instead of as a bargaining chip for a secretly negotiated peace.
Now you know just why there was never an instrument of surrender at the end of world war 2.
The U.S. concludes a peace treaty with Germany, going on to conquer Japan, whilst Germany remains bogged down in a guerilla war with the USSR for twenty years. The cold war in this 'alternative' is between the U.S. and Germania (Greater Germany)

The movie argued that the holocaust happened, and using poison gas instead of bullets in order to save bullets for the front. This is the most credible argument Your Minister has seen from the war-logic driving the Nazis. However, slave laborers are more productive than corpses. If Mossad or anyone else cares to provide hard documentary evidence of gassing chambers it may be useful to help sort out what is and isn't propaganda.

The plot of the movie revolves around the Wansee conference. The Wansee conference was the administrative conference instituted for the "final solution". If one reads that document one notes excuse after excuse supplied by the persons present for which jews would be exempted from deportation. After listing literally a dozen exceptions to deportation the document argues that those who would be deported shall be used to construct road works under the harshest conditions to kill off the weak and then the surviving fittest would be executed.

The Wansee document was first divulged in 1947. All the principal protocol members excepting Adolf Eichmann were dead by 1948. This Minister speculates that Eichmann was killed not for killing jews but to silence him about bank financial transfers.

Fate of those attending




In order of death
Reinhard Heydrich died in Prague on 4 June 1942 as a result of injuries sustained during a May 27 attack by Czech resistance fighters parachuted in from England.
Roland Freisler was killed in an air-raid in Berlin in February 1945.
Rudolf Lange was killed in action in Poland in February 1945.
Alfred Meyer killed himself in April 1945.
Heinrich Müller was last seen in Berlin on 29 April 1945. His fate is unknown, but he probably died in Berlin in the next few days.
Martin Luther finished the war in a German concentration camp after falling out with Foreign Minister Joachim von Ribbentrop in 1943. After being freed by the Soviets, Luther died in Berlin in May 1945.
Karl Eberhard Schöngarth was executed for war crimes (killing British prisoners of war) in May 1946.
Friedrich Wilhelm Kritzinger was acquitted of war crimes and died in October 1947.
Josef Bühler was tried in Poland for war crimes and executed in Kraków in July 1948.
Erich Neumann was briefly imprisoned and died in mid-1948.
Wilhelm Stuckart was imprisoned for four years before being released for lack of evidence in 1949. He was killed in a car accident in November, 1953.
Adolf Eichmann was executed in Israel in May 1962.
Georg Leibbrandt was charged with war crimes but the case against him was dismissed in 1950. He died in June 1982.
Otto Hofmann was sentenced to 25 years in prison for war crimes, but was pardoned in 1954. He died in December 1982.
Gerhard Klopfer was charged with war crimes but was released for lack of evidence. He became a tax advisor, later dying in January 1987.

"Die Menschenwuerde ist unantastbar." can moreover be correctly translated as "Human dignity is untouchable." As it seems is Your Minister.

M.A.R.S. - Pump Up The Volume

FOOD NOT BOMBS IN REAL LIFE: GOES BOTH WAYS.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnews/20081014/ts_usnews/newarmymanualshowcasessofterside

The Maoist Internationalist Art Ministry fully expects that the U.$. Army will be more aware of the costs of imperialism in the form of limbless kids. So we can expect the imperialist military, despite it's labor aristocracy base, to lead the imperialists in the direction of soft exploitation. This document is intended to give the imperialists protips about how to keep from coming home in boxes and without their limbs.

First, the MIM is not in any way controlling or directing the Third World's Army. We might give the Third World ideas but that's really it. You're welcome to continue wasting resources probing and harrassing MIM for non existent information, non existent links, something to justify your next promotion. Just don't expect that to lead anywhere. We already learned the lessons from the last counterinsurgency the imperialists lost, unlike the imperialists.

The imperialists answer to the last lost counterinsurgency was to clamp down on news (embedded reporters, censorship) and to insist only on fighting wars with popular approval. Well, guess what, the war in Iraq has no public approval. Moreover, those tricks of censorship didn't do anything to lessen your death-and-might-as-well-be-dead rates. Yep, fewer imperialists die in Iraq than in Vietnam but only because a lot more imperialists are coming back from Iraq with brain damage, no limbs, deaf and scarred for life physically and mentally.

This is the reality: The only sector of imperialism with a concrete interest in peace is the military, which also just happens to be the only sector that is at all altruisitic. When the MIM Art Ministry says the imperialist pigs don't deserve the sacrifices of their loyal stupid armies that's what it means. The pigs in the imperialist center ONLY care about the trough, not any of the higher values of patriotism (in the sense of love of one's own country, not in the sense of hatred of other's), AmeriCanism (liberty, freedom, justice -- those values the pigs offed back in reconstruction) self sacrifice etc. Nope, all the pigs in ameriKKKa want is MOAR MOAR MOAR

And who gives a damn if some cog in the machine loses his foot, his leg, his arm her mind?

So Imperialist Militarists: Willing to take some protips in winding down the insurgency? Great! MIM noticed your new manual on "soft war". Okay, now let's get something straight:
You don't want to die.
We don't want to die.
You're probably willing to die, even though the people you'd do that for don't deserve it.
We're definitely willing to die. Go right ahead, take out mousnonya it won't change anything.

Now, just because you and we are willing to drop dead trying doesn't mean we actually have to go out and keep doing that. In fact, we're fairly sure you're figuring out going out and actually doing that HASN'T made things better and even has only made them Worse. Sucks. Not our fault. This is definitely an "away" game.

So, you don't WANT to die? Right. Well, we actually don't mind doing that. We're sort of indifferent. However, since we sort of have some unity about that whole dying thing let's sort of back away from the triggers detonators knives and cameras.

Your soft exploitation document makes the brilliant equation that "ending poverty in the Third World reduces the risk of terrorism". YOU imperialist militarist are WAY ahead of the game in comparison with your pig masters back in Washington & the heartlessland. Why do you love pigs? I mean, you have to figure it out eventually so when you are willing to tell us, yeah, they ARE pigs and not your moral equals we can go into that whole "Wasting your love on the wrong people" thang.

Ok, so the Military is looking at working with NGOs however possible to end poverty. Since the military is actually on the ground MIM' Art Minister, for whatever it is worth, says "give them a chance this time". Let the NGOs go out and risk their necks. So long as you don't set up NGOs for ambush to generate a nasty incident MIM Art Minsitry won't target your operations. We trust the NGO's on the ground to know what's worth risking to get food out for and what isn't.

Likewise, we will ask our Saudi friends to consider altering oil prices & production schedules based on U.S. airdrop of MREs to the peasants in Iraq and Afghanistan. Amerika has plenty of food. Amerika doesn't have much oil. Zakat is as Zakat does.

Part of your problem is cultural. You Imperialists are seen as exporting a whore and war culture to people who don't really want to be your whores. Well, MIM hasn't been directly pointing out the whore culture is the reality in the imperialist countries in an attempt to capture the 1% of amerikunts with some radical tendencies. Just like we haven't painted you as whoremongers, too vividly, trying to get everyone to stop killing each other -- we could crank up the burka porn or the burka bombing. We don't *want* to do any of that. We just say it all clearly

MIM doesn't need first world style democracy as a goal. We always have emphasized survival rights over any other rights. Nation building is just code for setting up one lackey to knock down another. We don't want that.

The peace corps is already exposed throughout the world as a CIA front anyway. You might as well use them, or simply soldiers out of uniform for aid work. The particulars of uniformed and uninformed aid work are the call of the people on the ground - the military, mostly, but also the ngos. We just want to make clear what's desirable, what's acceptable, and what's not such a big deal as you might think. To say again, over:
1) Drop food, not bombs.
2) No set ups of "incidents".
3) No double crossing. All those lackeys you set up to knock each other down have figured your game out. Your only chance is to treat them all with an even hand or they will just send more of your friends and relatives home in boxes without legs.
4) Democratization and nation building are just not that big a deal.
5) Respect of local culture means not trying to impose the whore and war culture thanks to CIA pseudofeminist shills like Gloria Steinem.
You don't have to do anything for or against the local culture or it's political system from our perspective. The formula is:
Economic development in the Third World makes terrorism pointless.
We will ask our contacts for restraint provided you act in ways that deserve that.

Finally, thanks to you disrupting our communications these statements are only binding on and reflection of the Art Ministry's views. If the MIM Chair or CC decide to countermand these views that's life. Nothing I can do about that. There are limits.

What's 1000 points between friends?

Market recovery is conditional on withdrawl from Iraq, full stop.

Whether detainees are held for a week, a month, or half a year is irrelevant to the global struggle.
Whether the market does or does not recover is relevant to the global struggle.
Whether the imperialists abandon their fucked up misadventure in Iraq is highly relevant to the global struggle.

Britain's so-called competent leadership should withdraw from Iraq. Maybe then the amerikunts will get the hint.
If the anglo american imperialist refuse to withdraw from iraq post haste, expect the art ministry to crank out lots of questionable propaganda, whether anonymously or not.

Setting up fascists to pressure the imperialists and get their asses tossed in jail isn't that difficult. And the imperialists know the backbone of their armies are fascist.

Claro? GTFO IRAQ.

Conceptualizing a Structured, Orderly, and Safe U.S. Disengagement from South Central Asia

U.S. Imperialism is in a bad way. This can hardly be considered the fault of the ICM. However, the ICM and U.S. imperialism both have a common interest in seeing the U.S. get out of South Central Asia in as bloodless a fashion possible.

In that the U.S. imperialists created the mess of having betrayed all factions in Iraq in turns, and also by invading Iraq in the first place, the imperialists know the situation on the ground much better than the MIM. So they are in the position to already know better than the MIM just what to do. From the MIM side of the picture, MIM can trade a respectful silence for less blood. We can trade our sweat for your blood imperialists and that trade should go on the "we sweat more and you bleed less" side of the equation even though it could go just the opposite way. We will end sweatshops but triage makes clear, ending the wars the imperialist start is a higher priority than ending sweatshops. In that sense the imperialists operations in south central asia succeeded in extracting marginally greater labor from southeast asia than would otherwise have been the case. However, even the imperialists should now see that their labor extraction was less than their surplus value expenditures. That war was god damned expensive and not just in limbless farm kids.

So: we should give the imperialists in the administration transition a chance to withdraw from Iraq with as little violence as possible. Of course, having set up a heroin trafficking business in Afghanistan to yet again devastate the U.S. inner city and being afraid of the people that they have been killing the imperialists cannot disengage from Afghanistan so quickly as either side might want.

Very well, as to Afghanistan the U.S. will take up a policy of development aid in the urban areas and food aid via air-drops in the rural areas. Helping the Afghani people switch their economy from opium and gun production to textiles is what it's all about.

The fears the imperialists have of terrorist action should be contextualized. Imperialists know full well false flags actions do happen. The MIM has never taken up armed struggle in the first world. The MIM has never argued for the Third World to strike at the imperialist center. True, such struggle would be suicidal for the ICM but these wars have shown that there is a point where people are so desperate they don't mind dying for their family.

The imperialists may never understand that the Maoist war fighting strategy really is organized around war prevention. That the Maoist war tactic really is designed around taking and inflicting the fewest casualties possible. Just like we Maoists can melt your economy down we can also build Third World economies up. The Third World is the global majority. That demographic will not change: the Third World has been and will continue to outbreed the first world. At some point the numbers will decide the issue. AIDS as genetic warfare only went so far. Running a genocide is a difficult thing. Even with the genocidal AIDs weapon the first world is still outnumbered and becoming more outnumbered.

The first world can view it's encircled dependent position with fear or hope. Despite their pig nature, no one is calling for the extermination of the first world even though exterminationalism has always been the imperialists game. We're the anti-death side and you're welcome to take tips from us. Get out of Iraq. Let the Iraqi people(s) work things out on their own. You made the mess. Staying will only make it worse.

Refinements & Speculations

We should abolish psychiatry, the medical drug approach to mental problems and transform psychology from craptastic bourgeois spychology into a marxist science of healthy attitudes and the study of social transactions.

"that culture is relatively autonomous from fine degrees of difference within the bourgeoisie. "

What is relative autonomy? A serious question. Not a rhetorical question. idgi.


Whitey is as whitey does. It's completely justified to harshly attack the Art Minster openly for saying you are a nigger because that word was always and everywhere until this generation a weapon of the oppressor. However brown paper bag lunchers agree: when I say niggy, you say nothing: not talking about problems is a great way to keep them from getting solved. In this regard Saul Williams should be studied.

The white nation in north amerika is politically bankrupt and should go into receivership. If it's liberators, the Reds, the Blacks, the Mestizos want to change the language that too will be part of the JDoP. We work with what we have, which is imperfect tools in a flawed era. Maybe 150 years from now everyone will be telling nigger jokes as a way to mock the white man's dead empire. No one can completely predict cultural developments of people whose parent's are not even born yet. Stupid whites. Lazy whites. If they only worked for a living instead of sitting around telling nigger jokes.

An example of the unpredictability of the culture of the future: mousnonya had no idea that asians were the least marriagable from the white perspective. At least it's not just being a mouse that's keeping me out of or inside of that dating pool.

Whites in the Americas need to learn to see themselves as guests and act accordingly. Whites have been bad guests and basically trashed the place.


Each linguistic minority in the U.$ Should have it's own schools.

foad

The Amerikunts

are completely unworthy

of the noble sacrifices

of their imperialist mercenaries

whether uniformed

or knot.

ALSO:

reading between the lines

congratulations on your child.

no, we never met. mim has no central command.

Race is socially constructed: calling out brown paper bagism

When MIM says "there is no such thing as race" they play into post modernism. Taysach's disease disagrees and so do other genetically vectored diseases. The white race evolved into white skin due to vitamin d deprivation. Also different degrees of lactose tolerance also reflect the winter dietary possibilities -- or lack thereof -- of the various races.

However to go from saying there are evolutionary differences as to disease resistance (not all the natives were INTENTIONALLY poisoned with smallpox laden blankets, even though lots of them were) to saying that there are genetic differences as to intelligence is one small step for man, one giant leap backwards for the human race. If monkeys share 99% of human genome dna then the racial differences within the human races are likewise much less than the similarities.

Further some genetic features such as blood type do not track race.

So if one wants to argue in materialist terms about blood quanta great. The correct argument is that race isn't only skin deep and also goes to blood type and *gasp* culture.

Race isn't socially constructed -- but racism is.

Also MIM answered a question mousnonya has been wondering about, whether the party should go above ground. It should not, but a debate about that would be useful. There is no call for armed struggle in the first world, however there is plenty of state repression. So going above ground is just asking for it.

Bottomed out?

MIM thinks the market has bottomed out. However a run on the bond market and the FDIC uninsured money markets would drive it further down. There is plenty of white grass roots opposition to the congress bail out plan. MIM should take the side of the labor aristocracy for once, just to be, you know, fair and balanced. Opposing the bailout plan would push the split between the first world aristocracy and the u.s. labor aristocracy. Also, Iran should run the counterfeit presses. The republicans have already admitted they will not bomb Iran -- October surprise is the stock market, not another war. Act accordingly MIM.

Race is socially constructed: calling out brown paper bagism

When MIM says "there is no such thing as race" they play into post modernism. Taysach's disease disagrees and so do other genetically vectored diseases. The white race evolved into white skin due to vitamin d deprivation. Also different degrees of lactose tolerance also reflect the winter dietary possibilities -- or lack thereof -- of the various races.

However to go from saying there are evolutionary differences as to disease resistance (not all the natives were INTENTIONALLY poisoned with smallpox laden blankets, even though lots of them were) to saying that there are genetic differences as to intelligence is one small step for man, one giant leap backwards for the human race. If monkeys share 99% of human genome dna then the racial differences within the human races are likewise much less than the similarities.

Further some genetic features such as blood type do not track race.

So if one wants to argue in materialist terms about blood quanta great. The correct argument is that race isn't only skin deep and also goes to blood type and *gasp* culture.

Race isn't socially constructed -- but racism is.

Also MIM answered a question mousnonya has been wondering about, whether the party should go above ground. It should not, but a debate about that would be useful. There is no call for armed struggle in the first world, however there is plenty of state repression. So going above ground is just asking for it.

Bottomed out?

MIM thinks the market has bottomed out. However a run on the bond market and the FDIC uninsured money markets would drive it further down. There is plenty of white grass roots opposition to the congress bail out plan. MIM should take the side of the labor aristocracy for once, just to be, you know, fair and balanced. Opposing the bailout plan would push the split between the first world aristocracy and the u.s. labor aristocracy. Also, Iran should run the counterfeit presses. The republicans have already admitted they will not bomb Iran -- October surprise is the stock market, not another war. Act accordingly MIM.

BEAR RUN ON THE BOND MARKET

The United States have NEVER defaulted on a bond issue.

NEVER.

...heh

heh.

heh

Chains, forged in gold

"The real class conscious proletariat in the world is wondering whether it should land more economic blows at precisely this moment."

Hint: YES.
When your enemy is reeling you should punch even harder.

"In Arkansas, the pro-Stormer Euro-Amerikans called what Bill Clinton was doing "communist" and he lost one election. People who are really on the "Left" find that almost incomprehensible."

Try this: THE ENEMY IS INCOHERENT. TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT!

"hat is why it is a 50-50 question whether the planet might as well hurtle headlong to hell via Depression--right now."

90/10 please. Oh please. Please!
MIM already admitted a global depression would hurt the imperialists much worse than the Third World
THE PROLETARIAT IS THAT CLASS WITH *NOTHING* TO LOSE BUT IT'S CHAINS!
That should answer the question. What does the proletariat care if its oppressors discover what it's like to go hungry first hand?

Let's hope Iran decides to flood the market with counterfeit currency.

"Maybe we should side with Ron Paul for our own reasons."

Maybe! Keep the enemy guessing!

"MIM is also afraid of what could come from a Depression."

Waah waah waah. Piss off. Try being afraid of a god damned drug dealing cop, a jet bomber or starvation. That fear is a reflection of bourgeois influence.

Unfortunately, an economic depression does increase the possibility of inter imperialist conflict increasing the short term possibility of nuclear war among the first world countries. The strength or weakness of the ICM is irrelevant. The ICM can ONLY become stronger through struggle, and this struggle will make the ICM stronger.

In the end, even a first world great depression 2.0 would not cause a nuclear war because the bourgeois elites don't want that. They have sufficient unity not to kill each other. It is only their labor aristocracy and the proletariat whom the bourgeoisie are willing to kill for oil. Not each other. That's class analysis.

So get over your fear its a reflection of
1) a lack of strategic confidence in the proletariat
2) bad class analysis.
3) bourgeois influences in the party which is inevitable because there's no first world proletariat.

"rich country capitalism will not produce fascism again"

ORLY? Guess what a global depression would unleash fascism. Bring it on.

How about "It might be best to fuck our class enemy in the ass with no lube and make them say 'thank you' because they are willing to kill for oil"?